User talk:Jjzeidner

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:


 * To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type &#126;&#126;&#126; (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (4 tildes).
 * Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
 * If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
 * Follow the Simplified Ruleset
 * Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
 * Remember Neutral point of view
 * Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

Posting on user pages
J.J., I have moved your comment from User:Zestauferov's userpage to his talk page. It is generally not acceptable to post messages on people's user pages without their consent. JFW | T@lk  13:36, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)

And thankyou for doing that Jdwolff (by the way I hope to meet up with you when I get back to the UK in September). OK, Jjzeidner, thankyou for your compliments and yes I would be very interested in joining in, but I am not sure I know enough about the issues yet. let me know what you hope to look ate specifically.Zestauferov 05:21, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Warning
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. Just zis Guy you know? 20:22, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Linkspam
So far the only article space edits of yours that have seen have been promoting your own blog. You are in danger of violating the no spam rule. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 19:42, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Singularity
We are building an encyclopedia here, not fighting a war. We have policies here that govern what we can and cannot do (WP:RS, WP:NPOV, WP:SPS, WP:COI, WP:SPAM, WP:EL, WP:V and a host of others). Your insistence of adding links to your own blog can be counted as external link spamming (see WP:EL for what can be a valid external link) and might lead you to you being blocked. For any matter, we just state the facts, and leave the interpretation to users. Promoting any reference of interpretation over others is POV-oriented, which is against out principles of WP:NPOV and hence disallowed here. For software licensing stuff, we just state what the license is, we leave it to the user to decide what to infer from it. We do not say what it is suitable for and what it aint. The article makes it very clear it isn;t under the MSPL or MSRL (I think this is the other open source MS license), so there isn't any whitewashing going on here, but your insistence is propagandizing. Stop it. Talk out the issue first, in a calm civil way, without resorting to name calling and accusations. The way you are proceeding is detrimental to the entire Wikipedia and will only lead you to being blocked. --soum talk 06:06, 14 March 2008 (UTC)