User talk:Jjziem51/Antony Uwin

The article has a good introduction, straight and to the point. The introduction is a good length, since the entirety of the wikipedia page doesn't have a lot of content. However, the statement about where he works should also be in the work section if it is going to be in the introduction. All of the sections do a good job at staying neutral; the page has no unneeded adjectives or biased explanatory phrases. The notable works section has a clear organization that fits well with the section portrayal.

I don't think I like the fact that there is a "Work" section and a "Notable Works" section. If you want a section talking about the work that he does I would call it "Career" instead of "Work" to make it clear how the sections are different. The work section also seems a bit jumbled. The quote he made about AIGA is kinda thrown in there and I don't see how the quote is relevant to his career discussions. The second and fourth sentences could almost be made into their one section title "relationships" or "professional network." Make sure every sentence that provides any type of outside information is cited.

I noticed how you bolded the person in the first sentence of your introduction, which I forgot to do in my article.