User talk:Jkaste

December 2022
 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must: Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Cullen328 (talk) 17:03, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Unblock discussion
Please describe what constructive edits you would make.--  Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:23, 6 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The constructive edits I want to make includes edits on the pages of the three UEFA European club competitions. Sometimes, dates on upcoming happenings aren't correct. Also, I have insight in unreleased intel that might help the site in the future. Jkaste (talk) 13:20, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Unreleased intel does not meet the requirement that all content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking." -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:52, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I see. Then I will make sure that doesn't happen. Citation will always be done. Jkaste (talk) 16:08, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
 * What say ye? - UtherSRG (talk) 15:19, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * , thanks for asking. The phrase concerns me. I would like Jkaste to read No original research and commit to following that core content policy closely. Once that is done, I do not object to unblocking this editor. Cullen328 (talk) 17:51, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * The article is read and this will be taken very seriously. I see why one of Wikipedia's core policies is that no original research belongs on their public (non-talk) pages. Jkaste (talk) 18:19, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

globally renamed Fotcalc to Jkaste
It is done. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC)