User talk:Jking365

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Jking365. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 15:18, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Connection to David Bell?
Do you have a connection to David Bell? ElKevbo (talk) 00:56, 27 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Yes, I was asked by the author’s partner to make updates to the author's Wikipedia page and agreed to do so on a voluntary basis.
 * After reading the Conflict of Interest policy today, I now understand that not disclosing my COI previously could result in my being sanctioned or banned from this platform and a possible undoing of my edits. While I appreciate that to be the case, I am asking for leniency for my mistake as I intend to thoroughly disclose my COI in the future. Additionally, you will find that my edits all adhered to the Wikipedia Core Content Policies in that they (1) stuck to a neutral point of view, (2) were verifiable as I added reliable sources, links and citations to my edits and (3) didn't include original research/thought. My intention wasn’t to mislead anyone by not disclosing my COI. In fact, I didn’t realize I violated the COI policy until looking at my messages during my most recent login and reviewing the policy today. (Not sure what's more embarrassing, the fact that I violated the policy or that I completely missed a message about potential violation 3 years ago). In my mind, I didn’t have a conflict of interest because everything I was adding was factual and verifiable. I understand now I was mistaken and should’ve read the Wikipedia policies more thoroughly before making edits.
 * Going forward, I will have my conflict of interest publicly disclosed on my user page. I will also add my COI to the edit summaries for minor changes. For significant changes, I will make sure to make edit requests where I will also disclose my COI.
 * Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Again, I apologize for my ignorance and mistakes. Jking365 (talk) 18:08, 11 May 2022 (UTC)