User talk:Jkjq

Welcome!

 * }

September 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Jackelin j jarvis has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.mysterouslucania.blogspot.com. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:12, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jackelin j jarvis
A tag has been placed on Jackelin j jarvis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:49, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your email. Please don't apologise; Wikipedia is keen to encourage everyone to edit, but that means we are not very good at explaining up-front what sort of entries are acceptable. There is a useful guide to contributing at Your first article which explains most of it, and I personally wish there were a way to make new contributors read that before setting up an account, but there doesn't seem to be. Two of the things I would like to warn people about sooner are:
 * We are selective about article subjects: they need to have what we call notability, which is not a matter of opinion but needs to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." The point is that we don't make value judgements about what is an interesting or important subject: we ask, have other people, independent of the subject, found it interesting and important enough to write about?
 * An anyone-can-edit encyclopedia is very vulnerable to being used for promotion, and to try to combat that we discourage anyone from editing on subjects on which they have a WP:Conflict of interest, and discourage WP:Autobiography in particular.
 * But, as I say, there is no way you should have known all that in advance, and you have nothing to apologise for. We have no control over Google, which picks up and indexes new contributions with alarming rapidity, but I think the entry will drop off its radar soon. Please read WP:Your first article, and some of the other links from the Welcome paragraph above, to learn more about contributing.
 * Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:27, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Lucan portrait of Leonardo
LOOK before you leave a page that you have editted. That is the absolute bottom line for saving any edit.

Your changes to two file names (i.e. the code by which pictures appear where they are put in articles) meant that the two pictures no longer appeared. If you had looked at the effect of your changes you would have seen that where previously there was a picture (the subject of the article) there was now just a string of words that the computer no longer recognised.


 * 1) Don't change anything that starts with the words "File" or "image" or "picture file".
 * 2) Don't leave any edit that you make without looking at the page before you go. Use "Show preview" before you save, and look again, after you save.

Amandajm (talk) 09:53, 27 February 2013 (UTC)