User talk:Jklamo/Archive 1

Yangluo bridge opening
Noticed the addition if this new bridge to the list of longest suspension bridge spans. Do you have a link to information about the opening of the bridge? At #9, it seems well worth having its own article, and perhaps a DYK mention. I haven't found any information about it. -- &#x2611; Sam uelWantman 20:46, 29 December 2007 (UTC)


 * For sure, this is only one source in english (published on various webpages) . Note that it is mentioned as cable-stayed bridge, altough it is obviously suspension. There are more sources in Chinese language. Unfortunately i cannot speak chinese, i am just using automatic translators, so i do not feel to be right person to create good article about that bridge, i can only create some short stub. --Jklamo (talk) 01:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I was hoping you had found something I hadn't. Even a short stub is better than nothing. -- &#x2611; Sam uelWantman 08:21, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

List of billionaires (2008)
I took your draft for List of billionaires (2008) and placed it there after I requested an unlock, just FYI. I hope you don't mind :) Gary King (talk) 02:38, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Talk:List of billionaires (2008) Gary King (talk) 16:10, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Aircraft carrier class names
Why are you orphaning and tagging for deletion plausible abbreviated class names like Ford class? If one person has used it in the past, someone is likely to use it again in the future even if it is orphaned. Eluchil404 (talk) 22:40, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

E50
I was wondering about setting up a table to show the itinerary on this entry. It doesn't seem to have any very regular contributors, and I'm not sure a lot of people are taking time with these E-route entries. BUT I see that you are interested in this one. Good. Here are my questions:

The table I have in mind is inspired by Italian wiki itinerary table on some of the E roads. I've already experimented a little with adapting the format for English wiki - eg E27 (see also discussion page for that entry if you've time to follow this up) or E313, but E50 would be a much bigger project, and I don't want to take the time if either (1) someone else - you? - is already working on the same thing or (2) the format needs - or would be helped by - improvement before going further.

Do you have any thoughts to share on this, please?

Regards Charles01 (talk) 16:05, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Why Is the Bridge of the Americas a Cantilever Bridge?
I see that you reverted the List of longest cantilever bridges to put Bridge of the Americas back on the list after it was removed. Please explain on the Talk:Bridge of the Americas why you say that this bridge is a cantilever bridge. There was a previous discussion on that page that agreed it was not a cantilever. - SCgatorFan (talk) 02:29, 20 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I would question some of the others, as well, but in this case even its own article does not claim that it is a cantilever. Mangoe (talk) 11:40, 20 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I expect all is now clearly described on Talk:Bridge of the Americas. --Jklamo (talk) 13:50, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

WarSaw
Check this: http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warszawskie_wie%C5%BCowce#Warszawskie_wie.C5.BCowce --Siekierki (talk) 05:53, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Tyn Cathedral
I see that you removed the additional pic. I put it on there because the pics of this beautiful church are horrible in the original article. Please post some pics that are CLEAR and a bit larger if you want to enhance the article, otherwise let others enhance it and don't undo those changes. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kev374 (talk • contribs) 05:16, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Information from emporis.com
I undid your reversion to my edit to the List of tallest buildings in China article. I removed emporis.com's reference to "Heifei Feicui T.V. Tower" because the information from the site is wrong, they cannot even spell the name of the building right.--Kingdomer (talk) 21:50, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * See my edit summary in article. Anyway discussion page of article is much better place to discuss then there. --Jklamo (talk) 02:21, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Verification on Czech footballer of 1960s
Could I draw your attention to the article on Karel_Krejčí which is under threat of deletion. I note you have contributed to Czech football discussions, so you might be able to advise as to whether this article's claims can be verified. Kevin McE (talk) 10:25, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

TfD nomination of CIA attribution templates
Nine CIA attribution templates have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. -- Eastlaw  talk ⁄ contribs 22:30, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Input requested
Hi, your are listed in WikiProject Bridges and I wondered if you might want to weigh in on a requested move? There is a discussion here Talk:Suspension_bridge_types which results from a previous move. The discussion has major consequences on the content of the main article on suspension bridges? The root question: Is suspended deck bridge the proper name for a typical suspension bridge? - ¢Spender1983 (talk) 02:06, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

highway vs. motorway
Hi there. You were active with many Czech highway articles so I thought it's best to give you an explicit notice - Talk:Highways in the Czech Republic. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 19:20, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 05:45, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

List of companies by revenue
Hi. PetroChina is listed on the list ($149.3 billion), but its parent company is the CNPC. Its annual report shows no revenue but only operating income. But even the operating income itself is bigger thatn PetroChina's revenue. I don't know if I should just keep PetroChina or what. Any help?? Jonathansuh (talk) 23:31, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * As in its annual report "operating costs" are subtracted from "operating income", think that "operating income"=revenue, "operating costs"=expenses, "operating profit"=operating income. However i am not sure, if CNPC "consolidated" revenue (1,218,278 RMB mil) is including Petrochina revenue (1,019,275 RMB mil), as there is no list of consolidated companies in CNPC annual report. If yes, i think we should list only CNPC, if not than we shold list both of them.--Jklamo (talk) 09:16, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Another issue. Even the so-called "reliable" sources don't match up with financial exchange rates. The European Central Bank states that the December 31st, 2009 exchange rate for euro is: 1 euro = 1.4406 US dollars. However, FED states that it is 1.4332 USD. What the heck do we do? Jonathansuh (talk) 00:22, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * What are these "financial exchange rates"? There are multiple exchange markets, different last hour of day for different countries etc., thus it is not surprising that rates are different depending on source (oanda.com, site that I used to for exchange rates in past, is listing 1 EUR = 1.43322 USD for same day - so again different rate compared to ECB or FED rates). I proposed FED as source because list is in US dollars so use US "central bank" rates seems to be most suitable. We must just select some source (and list it somewhere in article). Anyway my opinion about choosing source is not so strong, so if you have some primary source with same coverage and reliability, feel free to post it and we can discuss it (better on article discussion page than here). --Jklamo (talk) 10:22, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Renewable energy task force
Please see Portal talk:Renewable energy... Johnfos (talk) 22:19, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cyril Despres


The article Cyril Despres has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one.  Chzz  ► 04:12, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

India Tower
Hi friend, I just reverted your edits, as you said while reverting my changes that "rv, stated as vision on skyscraperpage" if you read carefully on skyscraperpage i.e. here, which actually refers CTBUH as source, and CTBUH says its under construction. ref1, ref2 ref3 if you still want to see real progress about project, please follow this link [ http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=610347&page=28 ref4], I will be uploading few image to wiki/commons which shows its u/c. Found another source(http://www.pozzocrete.co.in/index.php?id=69&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=148&tx_ttnews[backPid]=4&cHash=95ebc8b5da) which says they started providing POZZOCRETE 63 (concrete) to project in Aug 2010. I think I dont have to explain why concrete is used for :), thanks KuwarOnline Talk''' 06:27, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * CTBUH is not always right. CTBUH is only the source for the height. I still miss a official statement by the developer that it is really under-construction. If you have a look at the architects website (Foster+Partners) you won't find that project there. At least, World One is also not under-construction yet. Jerchel (talk) 14:49, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Its certainly u/c, I think if didnt read above reference well, I insist u should read again, one more from emporis.com which clearly says its u/c, also visit India Tower, my self uploaded few construction pics, also see google map for satellite images here, which shows big triangular hole, about World One, I will get back to you on this soon. KuwarOnline Talk''' 19:43, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Burj Khalifa building.jpg and List of tallest buildings in the world
Please do not restore this image to that article again. The use of non-free images on lists such as this, especially when a main article exists for it, is not supported. I've re-removed the image from that article, and re-removed the (very inadequate) rationale from the image's description page. If you have questions, ask. Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 14:30, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Hamburg S-bahn a metro
See my addition to discussion, with more detail added, that was not mentioned in the discussion. Pls reconsider. 70.137.138.216 (talk) 13:07, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
Suraj T  11:52, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ECM Real Estate Investments


A tag has been placed on ECM Real Estate Investments requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. andy (talk) 23:17, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Your HighBeam account is ready!
Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know: Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 20:47, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Your account activation code has been emailed to your Wikipedia email address.
 * Only 407 of 444 codes were successfully delivered; most failed because email was simply not set up (You can set it in Special:Preferences).
 * If you did not receive a code but were on the approved list, add your name to this section and we'll try again.
 * The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
 * To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1; 2) You’ll see the first page of a two-page registration. 3) Put in an email address and set up a password. (Use a different email address if you signed up for a free trial previously); 4) Click “Continue” to reach the second page of registration; 5) Input your basic information; 6) Input the activation code; 7) Click “Finish”. Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive.
 * If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi.  Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
 * A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate
 * HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
 * Show off your HighBeam access by placing on your userpage
 * When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Wikipedia Stories Project
Hi!

My name is Victor and I'm a storyteller with the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit organization that supports Wikipedia. I'm chronicling the inspiring stories of the Wikipedia community around the world, including those from readers, editors, and donors. Stories are absolutely essential for any non-profit to persuade people to support the cause, and we know the vast network of people who make and use Wikipedia have so much to share.

I'd very much like the opportunity to interview you to tell your story, with the possibility of using it in our materials, on our community websites, or as part of this year’s fundraiser to encourage others to support Wikipedia. Please let me know if you're inclined to take part in the Wikipedia Stories Project, or if you know anyone with whom I should speak.

Thank you for your time,

Victor Grigas

user:Victorgrigas

vgrigas@wikimedia.org

Victor Grigas (talk) 23:15, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:REvueDevetsilu-1928-07.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:REvueDevetsilu-1928-07.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:57, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of long tunnels by type, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page León (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Template_talk:Czech_elections
Hello, seeing that you have contributed to the Template:Czech elections, I would like to invite you to share your view on inclusion of presidential elections prior to 2013 to the list. Thank you, Cimmerian praetor (talk) 12:51, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of companies of the Czech Republic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conglomerate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Streamliner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tatra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:19, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of newspapers in the world by circulation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Metro Express (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Highest points
Hi. Why do you think Category:Lists of highest points isn't a relevant category for List of highest bridges in the world? DoctorKubla (talk) 15:39, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
 * hi, that category seems to be geographically-based, so i think that is not so relevant. But if you do not want to have it in general Category:Lists of superlatives, i agree that it is most relevant from its sub-categories (Cateogry:Lists of tallest structures seems to be less relevant). So you if you want, you can revert my edit. --Jklamo (talk) 16:23, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I appreciate that "highest points" seems like a geographical distinction, but as you say, it's the most relevant of the superlative sub-cats. If there's enough articles to fill it, I might create Category:Lists of highest buildings and structures, along the lines of the existing cats for tallest, oldest, etc. DoctorKubla (talk) 17:53, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bata Shoes, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Britain and Pilsen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

List of Longest Tunnels
Hello! This article lists the longest tunnels in the world: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_longest_tunnels_in_the_world

This article lists another tunnel: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirlmere_Aqueduct

As you can see, the articles contradict each other. Therefore, I changed the first article so that Thirlmere was at the top of it. However, when I checked the article again several weeks later, it had returned to its current state! I asked Wikipedia what had happened, and they told me "The edit was made by a user called Jklamo. The 'Wiki way' when you want to contest someone's edit is to politely post on their user talk page, asking them why they made the edit".

So, this is my polite post - may I ask why you reversed my edit? Thanks! Robbieballantine21 (talk) 13:50, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of SSBT OD05 Omnibus
Hello Jklamo,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged SSBT OD05 Omnibus for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Gbawden (talk) 08:48, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of longest cable-stayed bridge spans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taizhou (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Companies of the Czech Republic
Perfect, thanks! Kuru  (talk)  22:40, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of companies of the Czech Republic, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Continental and Barum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter
Books and Bytes Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013 by , Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved... New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted. New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis?? New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration Read the full newsletter ''Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 21:08, 27 October 2013 (UTC)''

Disambiguation link notification for November 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of corporations by market capitalization, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roche (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Île-de-France tramway Line 7, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RATP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Highest-valued currency unit". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot   operator  /  talk 18:20, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mirek Topolánek's First Cabinet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Martin Štěpánek (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

AfD closure review
Hello! In light of the improper venue outcome of the DR/N discussion in which you participated, I am notifying you that I have asked Black Kite, the administrator that closed the AfD discussion for "Highest-valued currency unit", to review the result. The result of the discussion was "merge to List of circulating currencies" and I have asked Black Kite to reconsider the result because it appears that there was no consensus for the merge at the time of the discussion and because there is no consensus for the merge at this time. I invite you to give your opinion on the matter at the discussion taking place on Black Kite's talk page. I understand that this process has led to much contention between various editors. In the interest of expediency, I would like to suggest that you limit your comments to the issue of the AfD closure and not discuss any other issues. Thank you. – Zntrip 20:34, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library Survey
As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 15:27, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aleš Loprais


The article Aleš Loprais has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. WWGB (talk) 02:32, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Comments to cs:Diabetes mellitus 2. typu
Problems are: missing spaces, excess spaces, bad wikilinks (not only because of missing articles, but also because of incorrect formation) and use of non-existent templates on cswiki (I already fixed bad infobox with artifacts from denegue article). I am afraid that some of these problems could be easily solved, if translator bother to read the text after submitting it to cswiki. --Jklamo (talk) 03:06, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Many thanks. So we do inform all the translators when the articles are added and invite them to come fix the last few issues. The translations however are not being added by the translators but by a few of us English speakers. We are trying to recruit local Wikipedians to help and have managed in a number of languages but not yet unfortunately in Czech.
 * I think I have removed most of the templates that are none existent have I not? We are going through the source file to remove templates before translation so hopefully this will be less of an issue going forwards. Will look into the issue with spaces. I know that sometimes this is a malfunction with copy and paste. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 03:19, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Move discussion notice
I've initiated a move discussion at Talk:Porsche (disambiguation). Your comments are welcome there. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 06:32, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

List of largest companies by revenue
This list has several errors. Revenue (2013): 1-Walmart US$476.3 billion 2-Royal Dutch-Shell $451.2 b 3-Sinopec Group $445.3 b 4-China National Petroleum $432 b 5-Exxon-Mobil $420.8 b 6-BP $379.1 b etc. Source: Fortune Global 500 (2014). Cgx8253. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cgx8253 (talk • contribs)
 * Feel free to correct the list using proper sources and listing all figures, just changing ranking is not the correct way. --Jklamo (talk) 00:22, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of companies of the Czech Republic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conglomerate. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library needs you!
We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways: Sign up now Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
 * Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
 * Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
 * Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
 * Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
 * Research coordinators: run reference services

List of Czechs by net worth
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of Czechs by net worth. Cruks (talk) 20:40, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GroupCEZ EN.png
 Thanks for uploading File:GroupCEZ EN.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of tallest buildings in India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oh My God. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:02, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Energetický a průmyslový holding
Hi Jklamo,

where can I find the new annual report for EPH?--Kopiersperre (talk) 23:28, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Czechs by net worth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CPI Group. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:LongestTunnel
Template:LongestTunnel has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 15:02, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Skoda Works logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Skoda Works logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review needs your help
Hi ,

As an AfC reviewer you're probably aware that a new user right has been created for patrolling new pages (you might even have been granted the right already, and admins have it automatically).

Since July there has been a very serious backlog at Special:NewPagesFeed of over 14,000 pages, by far the worst since 2011, and we need an all out drive to get this back down to just a few hundred that can be easily maintained in the future. Unlike AfC, these pages are already in mainspace, and the thought of what might be there is quite scary. There are also many good faith article creators who need a simple, gentle push to the Tea House or their pages converted to Draft rather than being deleted. Although New Page Reviewing can occasionally be somewhat more challenging than AfC, the criteria for obtaining the right are roughly the same. The Page Curation tool is even easier to use than the Helper Script, so it's likely that most AfC reviewers already have more than enough knowledge for the task of New Page Review.

It is hoped that AfC reviewers will apply for this right at WP:PERM and lend a hand. You'll need to have read the page at WP:NPR and the new tutorial.

(Sent to all active AfC reviewers) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected
AfC Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of List of countries by motor vehicle production in the 2000s for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of countries by motor vehicle production in the 2000s is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of countries by motor vehicle production in the 2000s until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KAP03 (talk) 18:07, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Motor vehicle ranking
In the spirit of WP:BRD, can we all agree to stop editing/reverting articles concerning the ranking of motor vehicle production and to try to discuss it instead. After we have some form of resolution from the discussion (or at least an edict from the administrators), then we can make the articles match to whatever the discussion resolved.

Furthermore, a discussion spread out over many talk pages is hard to follow and mostly results in the same arguments being repeated for no benefit. If it failed to convince anyone at one talk page then why would it convince the same people at another page?

I suggest we put the majority of our discussion at Talk:List of manufacturers by motor vehicle production.

This message has also been placed on the talk page of the other editors involved.  Stepho  talk 01:14, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Rudolfinum
Hi there, you previously objected to my merge of Rudolfinum and Galerie Rudolfinum. I would appreciate if you could check out Talk:Rudolfinum and explain your objections, as I feel it's a trivial merge. Many thanks! Jdcooper (talk) 21:12, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (SkyscraperCity) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating SkyscraperCity, Jklamo!

Wikipedia editor Hydronium Hydroxide just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Meets credible claim of significance and formatting requirements, but possible Speedy:G4 per talk page."

To reply, leave a comment on Hydronium Hydroxide's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 04:22, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Changing name of Solovki prison camp; removing unrelated item from Languages on Dmitriev page
Dear Jklamo

I have followed your suggestions in revising several articles. Instead of saving each change as and when it's made I am trying to make several changes each time and then, after checking in the Preview mode, and making any further adjustments, saving the lot.

(One reason for my earlier practice is that I began editing online in the 1990s when email and, indeed, computers were far more volatile in their behaviour. The habit was tehn acquired of saving often to avoid sudden loss of any alteration.)

Now I face two principal tasks and would welcome your guidance:

1. For reasons stated on the Talk page I feel strongly that the name of the Solovki entry should be changed from the oxymoronic "prison camp" to special prison. No one has yet repled. How long do I wait before invoking Move?

2. Under languages a link appeared recently on the Yury Dmitriev page to a page in Arabic script.

After investigation with the help of a good linguist it has been established that this page probably originates from Azeri speakers in Iran and has NOTHING to do with Yury Dmitriev (it concerns legal definitions and does not mention the Karelian activist).

How can that unrelated link be removed? I have tried and so far not succeeded in getting rid of this unwanted and distracting addition to the page.

John Crowfoot (talk) 01:44, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of HB Reavis
Hello, Jklamo. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, HB Reavis, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit edit the page]
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:16, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Most expensive painting
As the page of the painting “will you marry me?” says it was sold for ~300 milions so why when I tried to adjust the price on tge list it was removed?? Eugeniocazzo (talk) 22:00, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
 * See reference.--Jklamo (talk) 22:26, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks I didn’t know, but then the price must also be changed on the painting’s page Eugeniocazzo (talk) 22:42, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

ANI Experiences survey
The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:


 * https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2017_AN/Incidents_Survey_Privacy_Statement

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.


 * Sign up here to receive a link to a survey

Please be aware this survey will close Friday, Dec. 8 at 23:00 UTC.

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:15, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

"half-year" results as ridership in List of metro system article
I saw you reverted my last edit because of it, but I want to make very clear that I merely fixed the form of a bad-shaped reference, without endorsing the substance of it. As a matter of fact, reading the source (a thing I did in order to correctly fill in the "cite web" template) it's obvious the contributor who firstly made the edit somewhat extrapolated the figure since: Therefore, aside from reshaping the reference in a way it'll "work", I added that caveat. If such an "extrapolated from partial" ridership figure doesn't comply with the consensus on that Wiki article, you'll have to blame the original contributor (who used such a data), and not me: deleting my caveat doesn't change the fact that the mentioned ridership of 3 million passengers is only a projections, and not a real, past data. If you want a policy-compliant figure, you'll have to retrieve the previous one (and its reference) searching in the revision history or to substitute it with an n/a, as a not-available data: which do you prefer? In both cases, I'm willing to do it personally. 93.57.255.93 (talk) 11:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * the source refers unambiguously to the year 2017, which has not yet ended;
 * the source reports a different number from that in the table (1.23 instead of 3.0 millions), and attributes it to the first semester.
 * Thanks for additional info. I did not notice, that you actually fix the reference.
 * Extrapolated projections really don’t comply with the consensus on that article, so I prefer to retrieve to retrieve the previous reference.--Jklamo (talk) 07:28, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Then, I'll try to find when the edit was made, so that we can retake the previous ridership data (which unfortunately I've only a vague recollection of) & the related reference. Once I've found it, I'll restore everything adding also an "Nb" that reports the remarkable increase in users this year. 93.57.255.93 (talk) 11:15, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I eventually found (by chance) a source wich reports the latest (2016) ridership figure for this system, therefore I fixed that cell in the table (which meantime has become even more a mess): it's a little late - more than two months after we spoke about it and near the end of the year, which will make "outdated" the newly added data - but, as it's said, better late than never! Anyway, best wishes and Merry Christmas. 93.57.255.93 (talk) 18:43, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 Dakar Rally, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tatra ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/2018_Dakar_Rally check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/2018_Dakar_Rally?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

February 2018
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to List of largest companies by revenue. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.  General Ization Talk  13:54, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Please consider to rephrase instead of reverting next. Note that everyone at enwiki is not a native speaker.--Jklamo (talk) 14:17, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Rampion Windfarm
Thanks for your edits to the Rampion page, but I think they are premature.

The wind farm is still under construction, and although all turbines have now produced power at one time or another, work is still underway both onshore and offshore (ref the additional reference you added "Over the coming months, work will continue both on and offshore, to prepare the site for full operation later this year." - indeed a couple of days ago, all turbines were stopped (I can see them from near my house) despite medium wind speed, low renewable generation and high grid demand. This is most likely due to ongoing commissioning work at the electrical substations and/or cable route.

The operator's page for the wind farm also shows "The wind farm has started generating power, with first electricity delivered to the grid in November 2017. It will be completed and fully operational in 2018." at https://www.rampionoffshore.com/

http://www.4coffshore.com/windfarms/rampion-united-kingdom-uk36.html states "Partial Generation/Under Construction" - which is also the case as far as I know.

Please can you revise your edits to reflect this, and only put the status to operational once the wind farm is fully commissioned?

--TimSmall (talk) 15:28, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi, in a case of wind farms definition of to be commissioned is a bit unclear. Feel free to fix and clarify my edit.--Jklamo (talk) 08:19, 7 May 2018 (UTC)