User talk:Jklein212

Archive
I have moved the warnings from 2008 into an archive, in User talk:Jklein212/archive2008. I hope this will be helpful; if you don't like it, please just undo my edits. Cheers,  Chzz  ►  01:22, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Archive
Created archive for content User talk:Jklein212/archive2009.--Jklein212 (talk) 07:38, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Jklein212/jonathanhay (publicist)
A tag has been placed on User:Jklein212/jonathanhay (publicist), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Flowanda | Talk 04:04, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jonathan_Hay_(publicist). Flowanda | Talk 04:17, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I've declined the speedy, as it seems you're using the article as a userspace draft, but caution you not to put that article back in article space with its current sourcing. The sources in the article are just name drops or bylines. You would need multiple, substantial sources independent of the article's subject that are about Jonathan Hays, not him writing about someone else, to write an acceptable article. At this point, I cannot find that those exist. Seraphimblade Talk to me 07:21, 20 November 2009 (UTC)