User talk:Jklove88

Welcome!
Hello, Jklove88, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Electromagnetic spectrum did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Johnjbarton (talk) 16:09, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024
Hello, I'm Guessitsavis. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Electromagnetic spectrum, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 17:48, 26 January 2024 (UTC)


 * well what I wrote on the visible light section was true, when people look up the electromagnetic spectrum, they have to know the basic applications of each light or electromagnetic waves.
 * I am a photographer, pho means light in Greek, and photography is forming images thru light. I am also a huge science nerd. So I know what I am talking about. Jklove88 (talk) 19:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
 * You may know, but we do not know you. Lots of whacky edits are made to wikipedia. To prevent such edits, we require evidence. Your personal conviction is fine, but please add references we can verify. Johnjbarton (talk) 22:37, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Guessitsavis probably should not have reverted all of what you added, but now that he has no one can reinsert it. We have a rule that anyone can challenge material that isn't sourced, and if so the material cannot be reinserted unless a reference to a reliable source is provided. We don't have to have a source for everything, but it has to be possible to find a source for every statement and we enforce that through this challenge mechanism. Normally only statements that are doubtful or controversial should be challenged.--Srleffler (talk) 20:50, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I found you a source!
 * You should be able to re-add your edit with that. Alternatively, if you'd prefer someone else do such and then credit you, let me know! Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 21:06, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
 * You should be able to re-add your edit with that. Alternatively, if you'd prefer someone else do such and then credit you, let me know! Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 21:06, 27 January 2024 (UTC)