User talk:Jkmarshall001

Original Research
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. You may find the following helpful (from ORIGINAL RESEARCH):

Consensus among Wikipedians is that Wikipedia does not publish original research or original thought. This includes unpublished facts, arguments, speculation, and ideas; and any unpublished analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to advance a position. This means that Wikipedia is not the place to publish your own opinions, experiences, or arguments. Citing sources and avoiding original research are inextricably linked: to demonstrate that you are not presenting original research, you must cite reliable sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and that directly support the information as it is presented.

"No original research" is one of three core content policies. The others are neutral point of view and verifiability. Jointly, these policies determine the type and quality of material that is acceptable in articles. Because they complement each other, they should not be interpreted in isolation from one another, and editors should familiarize themselves with all three.

If you have original research or commentary to contribute to a subject, there are numerous other places to do so, such as at WikiInfo.

Please note also that, while blanking a message from your Talk page is perfectly acceptable, it is taken as confirmation that you have read the message, and it won't hide the fact that you have been warned, which is clear from your talk page history. Hope that clears up any confusion--happy editing! -  Ro   Bo   Tam   ice 15:13, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

"Ownership of Articles
Please stop assuming ownership of articles. Doing so may lead to disruptive behavior such as edit wars and is a violation of policy, which may lead to a block from editing. -  Ro   Bo   Tam   ice 17:14, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

What the above statements actually mean to me
"Blah blah blah blah blah blah." I'm not confused. The page to which you refer is not "original research", it is just original. It will have it's reference material soon enough.JKM (talk) 18:28, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is a discussion on the conflict of interest noticeboard regarding your past edits. In particular, you've posted self-promotional material to articles like Drill team and New Mexico Military Institute. Per both WP:COI and WP:SPAM, editors should not post promotional information about themselves to Wikipedia. Examples of such can be found and. I've cleaned out the promotional material and caution you from using Wikipedia as a platform for self-promotion. --  At am a  頭 17:52, 27 July 2011 (UTC)