User talk:Jknight123

Spam in BrightHouse
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on BrightHouse, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because BrightHouse is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting BrightHouse, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 22:00, 4 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I have examined the deleted article, and understand why it was speedily deleted. The "article" was a blatant advertisement, full of company slogans, neologisms, peacock words and press-release braggartry of the sort accepted in the less reputable trade journals. If this were to be a legitimate article, then we would need an entirely different text, with impartial, neutral, encyclopedic content sourced from reputable places like Barron's or the Wall Street Journal. If you yourself are employed (directly or indirectly) by this firm, such an article should not be coming from you, as it would probably violate our standards on conflict of interest. Please read our guidelines on company-related articles for further information and guidance. -- Orange Mike  |  Talk  16:30, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of BrightHouse (retailer)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is BrightHouse (retailer). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/BrightHouse (retailer). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 18 March 2010 (UTC)