User talk:Jlbgiles

Unfortunately, despite the work you put into it
See WP:NEO-- SPhilbrick  T  21:56, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Edultery


The article Edultery has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unencyclopedic Content - WP:DICTIONARY

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Skamecrazy123 (talk) 17:11, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Edultery
I appreciate that you have created this page, but I'm afraid that Wikipedia is not a dictionary, per WP:DICTIONARY. You can, however, put it in Wiktionary instead/ --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 17:29, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Eslut for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eslut is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Eslut until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ryan Vesey (talk) 17:37, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Edultery for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edultery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Edultery until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ryan Vesey (talk) 17:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Edultery


The article Edultery has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Contested PROD. A fairly obvious breach of WP:DICTIONARY and possible breach of WP:HOAX. The Oxford English Dictionary reference can only be opened with a subscription and checks of other dictionary sites found that the word did not exist

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Skamecrazy123 (talk) 17:42, 13 July 2011 (UTC)