User talk:Jlee 28

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! --VirtualDelight 21:57, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

My good side is intact. Thus, liars exit. Fanny was never a professional a model. I represented her at Model Search Canada, as her agent. She did one show, Music Wake Fashion Show, free of charge. That made her an amateur model. She is not represented by any Actra agency, nor ever had any professional union membership in modeling. She created those posts for herself to sell herself, for services very unrelated to modeling. Thus she was fired by Model Search Canada & Orange Models which both represented her briefly.

She is a pageant winner, which is not the same as model. I need to protect my industry, as a professional model represented by the Union.Jlee 28 (talk) 18:43, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

malice-filled comments
Human nature is very intricate, so along those words I am trying to understand the drive that pushes you to spend your time adding negative and malice-filled comments about Fanny. I do not know the whole story and the why you feel compelled to adhere to this attitude, however I attribute it to a most likely misunderstanding. I have personally known Fanny for a long time, and her character and personal believes are of a very humble and good nature. I grant it that is impossible for anybody to be liked by everyone, and this message does not want to change your personal view of her. After all that is your opinion and we are all entitled to ours. However, I do disagree with the attitude that you have taken in that I believe that we should spend our energy creating, building, and not bringing down other people in the process. Your attitude is not only affecting her, but a lot of other people that love her and would do anything to protect her. Ironically, I am trying to appeal to your human nature, the good side that we all have. My intention is not to engage in an argument or a fight, like I said I think both you and I have better and more important issues that we could concentrate in. If you really have a strong opinion that some actions need to be changed, let’s be adults about it and discuss it in the most respectful and open minded approach. Trust me, we all win if you go about it like two mature and smart individuals. There are a few ways of dealing with issues, keep in mind that there are consequences to all our actions, that’s why we should try to come to the best outcome for both sides. I hope you have a good day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nrock2006 (talk • contribs) 04:41, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Fanny Samaniego
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Fanny Samaniego. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Fanny Samaniego. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:26, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Jlee 28. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page SmartCentres, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Thjarkur (talk) 19:08, 10 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Ya, I just had to remove some blatant advertising from the SmartCentres page. -- Kndimov (talk) 16:16, 15 October 2020 (UTC)