User talk:Jlevine13/Evaluate an Article

I found this article to be extremely succinct and professionally written. The article opens with a general introduction based in facts and cues us in to what to expect for the rest of the article. The content is thorough and relevant to the article. It is divided up into sub sections for clarity. The article is very neutral, explaining the objective facts of the sun stone. It also expresses viewpoints from the Aztecs as well as the Spanish colonizers to round out a viewpoint about the significance of the object. The sources cited in the article are reliable and there are many links to other wikipedia pages to provide more information on related people, objects, and ideas. The article is well written and clearly organized. All of the information in the sections of the article are relevant to the header of the section. The images provided are visually appealing and cited correctly. They all have captions and are helpful in the reader's understanding of the article. The Wiki talk page is active and insightful. There, I found much discussion over whether or not the sun stone is a calendar which is an interesting way to see different perspectives. I learned that this article is related to 2 wikiprojects: Mesoamerica / Aztec and Mexico. I enjoyed reading this article and believe that it is very thorough and complete. I don't know what else could be added but am enthusiastic about learning more about Aztec art and taking part in these active discussions and editing.Jlevine13 (talk) 18:38, 23 January 2023 (UTC)