User talk:Jlind0

March 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Lind Innovation has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Uncle Dick (talk) 20:41, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Article Deleted: Jason Lind
Welcome to Wikipedia! A tag was recently placed on the article Jason Lind requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, and the article has since been deleted. This has been done because the article did not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and please also keep in mind that Wikipedia is not a blog. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Davnor (talk) 20:44, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia.
 * I'm sorry, but this has been deleted as meeting WP:CSD. Please follow the link in the CSD warning message above to see why the article was deleted. Any deficiencies should be remedied before reposting.


 * For basic information on beginning to write an article see User:Dloh/new.
 * For more general information about the deletion process, please see User:Dlohcierekim/deletion
 * If you believe the subject does in fact meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information, please contact me on my talk page.
 * Other helpful pages are--
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest


 * If you wish to make test edits or work on the article before creating it, you can create a test page at User:/test and consider using the Article Wizard.
 * Cheers, and happy editing.  Dloh  cierekim  20:50, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ideal Organizational Theory
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Ideal Organizational Theory, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Kittensandrainbows (talk) 08:38, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Ideal Organizational Theory, you will be blocked from editing. Do not shirk the deletion process like that again. –MuZemike 09:23, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * "Only the moderators can determine if something is key insight, or just plain wrong." Utterly untrue - Wikipedia decisions are based on consensus of all editors. "I'm still trying to find an effective way to blog without turning the system completly against itself... any reccomendations?" Yes - create a blog! For example at bolgsopt. Do not try to use Wikipedia as a free host for your blog. &mdash; RHaworth

July 2013
Your recent editing history at P versus NP problem shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Also don't post your CV on Wikipedia again. kelapstick(bainuu) 09:35, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. kelapstick(bainuu) 09:40, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

For repeatedly adding your CV to and edit warring on P versus NP problem. --kelapstick(bainuu) 09:41, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

February 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Chess theory has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:24, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Chess theory was changed by Jlind0 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.906407 on 2016-02-13T12:24:06+00:00.

Your edits weren't constructive. Clearly this isn't the first time you've been warned about this sort of thing. Please stop. Jkmaskell (talk) 12:47, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. --John (talk) 14:57, 13 February 2016 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 07:09, 17 May 2016 (UTC)