User talk:Jlmazzone

Semiotics Of Salem Witch Trials
Hey, I found the article that you had created called the Semiotics Of Salem Witch Trials and would like to provide a few bits of advice. Firstly, the article is actually fairly well–written and referenced, a must for new Wikipedia articles; however, it is structured like an essay and not written in a formal encyclopedic tone. This makes the article at risk of being labeled with Original Research and Neutral Point of View concerns, and being nominated for deletion. I recommend that you rework the article so that it reads like an overview of the topic and less like an original academic work or an opinion piece. With that all being said, I feel the article has actual merit and thus did not label it with a maintenance tag (OR or NPOV). I tried to skim a few of the resources available to me and came up with a few pieces of info that could be added. Time willing, I will try to integrate them into the text ASAP. If you need any help or advice, please feel free to ask me on my talk page. Cheers! Deyyaz [ Talk 20:46, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Semiotics of the Salem witch trials
Hello, Jlmazzone, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Articles for deletion/Semiotics of the Salem witch trials whether the article Semiotics of the Salem witch trials should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Semiotics of the Salem witch trials, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! Jenks24 (talk) 07:03, 7 December 2011 (UTC)