User talk:Jln115

April 2020
Hello, I'm The C of E. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to New Zealand national rugby union team have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks..  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 14:25, 21 April 2020 (UTC) Your recent editing history at New Zealand national rugby union team shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 05:57, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

The fact is you undid my edit first, Yet you are claiming I'm the one starting an edit war? My edit was factually correct as New Zealand has in fact played Zimbabwe(Called Rhodesia back then). If we are to use the historic names of countries as they were called in past games then we should also include, Western Samoa, The British Lions, The Union of South Africa, South West Africa ect ect - Jln115

Boerboel
Regarding your recent edits, please refer to the Wikipedia policy about using WP:RELIABLE sources which are WP:INDEPENDENT of the subject. Breed clubs and breeder associations are not independent of this subject. They are good for producing breed standards and the histories of their own organisations. They are not reliable for history or purported abilities of dogs.

Here is a copy of the Act that you have cited - I see no such entry regarding SABBS. The onus is on you as a Wikipedia editor to check the sources that you present. William Harris (talk) 21:00, 7 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Your research abilities to help clarify this matter impresses me; well done.
 * PS: I am a WPDOGS recent changes patroller - you will see me around many of the dog-related articles. William Harris (talk) 10:47, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Hello, I'm William Harris. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Boerboel have been undone because you deleted an expert WP:RELIABLE, WP:SECONDARY historical source because you appear to personally disagree with it. Please desist. William Harris (talk) 08:04, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Boerboel. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. William Harris (talk) 10:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Boerboel shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.. Cavalryman (talk) 10:56, 24 November 2020 (UTC).

March 2022
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Boerboel, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:28, 25 March 2022 (UTC)


 * My Source is the American Kennel club, that is certainly a reliable source. https://www.akc.org/dog-breeds/boerboel/ Jln115 (talk) 13:28, 5 April 2022 (UTC)