User talk:Jlou17

August 2017
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Springfield, Illinois. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:50, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dooney Boys


A tag has been placed on Dooney Boys requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. red dogsix (talk) 21:45, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kilo G


A tag has been placed on Kilo G, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion,. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:56, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Algiers, New Orleans, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:53, 3 September 2017 (UTC) (talk) I am sourcing my information

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Magnolia Projects. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:12, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Algiers, New Orleans. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:14, 3 September 2017 (UTC) Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Dooney Boys. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. red dogsix (talk) 01:55, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Christopher Homes. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:15, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

last unblock request you put "You'll need to explain your common interest in Kilo G." so I did. My last account was blocked for the same issue and by the same user. My last account I was blocked for correcting adding a reference to a page that have been vandalized.

Huon I did they still blocked my whole IP address for good so I created a new account. I had no knowledge of sockpuppetry if I have engaged in it I didn't know until now. I would love to start over fresh this time. My apologies if I did violate any guidelines.
 * Creating a new account to evade a block on a previous account is sockpuppetry. When someone is blocked, there are serious concerns about their editing. Those concerns need to be resolved; the block is not just an invitation to create a new account and carry on as if nothing had happened. Any new accounts created to evade a block will be blocked, too; you should request your original account to be unblocked and should address the concerns that led to that original block. Only when that original block has been resolved should you resume editing. Huon (talk) 11:06, 9 September 2017 (UTC)