User talk:Jlundell

Green Party of California
Nice job with this. It deserves some fleshing out, but I'm from Massachusetts and out of touch with GPCA. Check out how I set up the Massachusetts equivalent, the Green-Rainbow Party. Colby 19:43, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:Peter Camejo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Peter Camejo.gif I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. &mdash; neuro  (talk) (review) 20:12, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Message from zfishwiki
Thanks for responding to the issue I raised on Talk:Droop quota and the link to your paper. I had a look at it and I seem to recall reading it previously. I guess this means you're famous in these circles!

I made a few improvements to the section on meek's method in counting single transferable votes, but like the droop quota article it needs a complete rewrite. Sadly, I couldn't be bothered learning LaTeX so I guess I'll have to leave it to someone else :-)

Zfishwiki (talk) 13:12, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Re:Protection of Peter Camejo
Can I refer you to what Will Beback stated on the article's talk page? He said it as well as I believe I could have. His argument, I believe, is that the IP's edits are not blatant vandalism, but instead lack NPOV. I believe he will be trying to talk to the IP in a way to discourage future vandalism of Green Party politician's articles. Happy editing!  Malinaccier ( talk ) 01:19, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Bucklin voting
You may be interested to know that there is a dispute about the Bucklin voting page ongoing. The issues are:


 * 1) Can the term "Bucklin voting" comprehend systems which allow equal and/or skipped rankings?
 * 2) If so, do such systems meet the IIA and Clone independence criteria?

(One possible answer to either question is that we can't say either way because we don't have relevant citations to reliable sources. In that case, we must choose what we can say.)

Your participation in the discussion might help us attain consensus.

Cheers, Homunq (talk) 01:34, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Pietisten
Hi, I changed the heading from "Pietisten pånyttfödd" to "Pietisten (1986–present)". I think it is probably more encyclopedic and gives more relevant information to list the date of the new one versus a Swedish word most people won't recognize, even if there is a gloss below. Thanks for adding the section, definitely an oversight on my part. flod logic (talk) 09:09, 27 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I figured it’d get changed eventually. I was going to use “Pietisten redivivus” to make a pun on “born again”, and did it in Swedish instead. The new publication revives the name and spirit of the old one, but is not the old one continued after a (long) hiatus, as it were. &mdash; JLundell  talk   13:13, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Thomas wright hill laws 1819.pdf


The file File:Thomas wright hill laws 1819.pdf has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the file should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cock Robin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burke's Law. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC)