User talk:Jlviegas

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dorothy Cheney (scientist) has been accepted
 Dorothy Cheney (scientist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Thsmi002 (talk) 21:38, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Dorothy_Cheney_(scientist) help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Nomination of Dorothy Cheney (scientist) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dorothy Cheney (scientist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dorothy Cheney (scientist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

The article wasn't ready to be moved out of draft space. Please in the future ensure that any article you approve will survive a deletion proposal. I doubt this one will. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:03, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Robert Seyfarth has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Robert Seyfarth. Thanks! Espresso Addict (talk) 19:01, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Seyfarth (May 31)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Espresso Addict was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert Seyfarth and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Robert Seyfarth, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Robert_Seyfarth Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Espresso_Addict&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Robert_Seyfarth reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Espresso Addict (talk) 19:05, 31 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Seyfarth is plainly notable but it seems duplicative of effort to have two articles covering almost identical ground; if you want to create two separate articles then it would be useful to distinguish their contributions more clearly. Espresso Addict (talk) 19:11, 31 May 2018 (UTC)