User talk:Jmac1983

Celtic Park
Hello, I'm Jmorrison230582. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Jmorrison230582 (talk) 14:07, 9 January 2015 (UTC)


 * 1. It would have helped if you had said that in the edit summary, rather than just deleting content without explanation. 2. "Paradise" is a widely used nickname for Celtic Park. Removing it appears to be just your opinion, which is not a valid reason for doing so. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 14:37, 9 January 2015 (UTC)


 * There are over 70,000 results for "Celtic Park" + paradise in a google search. It's a commonly used term for Celtic Park. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 16:46, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

It is only used by Celtic fans, wether it is common or not. A Aberdeen fan wouldn't say I am going to " paradise " on Saturday. The is a explanation that it is called Parkhead and paradise by fans. I believe that enough and I believe that if it is at the top like it is readers gathering information may take that as an official name. The will be Google results linking Liverpool fc with the term " The red men " but only Liverpool fans would ever call them red men. Maybe it should be made more clear that these are nicknames?
 * Those results include many uses of "Paradise" by newspapers. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 17:09, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

But will that be newspapers referring to it as a nickname will it not? I came up with a solution to put nickname above both Parkhead and paradise but you instantly removed it. So are you disputing that they are nicknames now? I gave a valid reason to change this but you don't seem to be taking that on board


 * It doesn't matter who uses the nickname, just that it is a non-disparaging nickname. It also doesn't need an ugly "NICKNAME" shouted disclaimer at the start. If you have concerns about the prominence given nicknames on the template, or any confusion that they may cause, please take it up on the template talk page.  The purpose of templates is to ensure uniformity, Celtic Park doesn't need special provision.  Thanks.  -- Escape Orbit  (Talk) 17:24, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Why not make it clear that it is a nickname? What is the problem? It is a casual name that the fans use. It isn't as common as Parkhead which is widely used. It doesn't seem clear


 * [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution.  In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 18:51, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

How many times have I tried to talk to you about and it was me who came up with the solution. I can't see what is wrong with placing nicknames above the NICKNAMES. Please explain the problem
 * The problem is your solution is not acceptable. You are adding things to the infobox in a non-standard and ugly way, and keep putting it back in when it has been reverted and explained to you.  This is called edit warring.  You have already breached the three revert rule and are close to getting blocked.  Please stop doing it and take the matter to the proper place to discuss. If you don't like "Paradise" being used as a nickname then raise the matter at Talk:Celtic Park.  If you don't like how the infobox appears, raise it at Template talk:Infobox venue.  Do not simply keep putting it back in without consensus. -- Escape Orbit  (Talk) 21:52, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

A ugly way? You do realise it was written exactly the same as Parkhead and paradise was written don't you? That was exactly my point earlier on. Why is it written there? As you said it is ugly and not explained. I thought Wikipedia was about giving correct information to people that are interested in a subject or want to learn something? Yet that is confusing and ugly ( Your words ) I came up with the solution hours ago but you and the other lovely chap jumped on it without listening or contemplating changing it. It doesn't look right where it is and it as no explanation.
 * As already explained; if you don't like the way it appears then say that on the appropriate talk page and maybe something will be done about it. I actually agree with you, the field could be better presented.  But your solution is, sorry, not acceptable, because it doesn't match the formatting of all the other fields and is non-standard.  The plural of nickname also doesn't contain an apostrophe. -- Escape Orbit  (Talk) 14:40, 10 January 2015 (UTC)