User talk:Jmb info

Regarding your edit to Hank Bauer:
Your recent edit to Hank Bauer (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism, link spam, or test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 17:27, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on CigArrest, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Pascal.Tesson 04:44, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

George Bitar
A tag has been placed on George Bitar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Pascal.Tesson 04:45, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your edit to Dr Robert Maloney:
Your recent edit to Dr Robert Maloney (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism, link spam, or test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 15:47, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, I have undone the changes by VoABot II. It seems that you were trying to cut down the article back to something reasonable and verifiable. I'm still not sold on whether or not this doctor (even with the Extreme Makeover credentials) is significant enough to have a WIkipedia entry but that 3 line stub is much better than the full blown resumé. Cheers, Pascal.Tesson 15:53, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

I am trying to learn. I think I did this correctly this time.

promotion and advertising
This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent insertion of spam, commercial content, and/or links is prohibited under policy. Any further spamming may result in your account and/or your IP address being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. You are, however, encouraged to add appropriate content to the encyclopedia. If you feel the material in question should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. --Hu12 16:04, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

AfD Nomination: Robert Maloney (doctor)
An editor has nominated the article Robert Maloney (doctor) for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Articles for deletion/Robert Maloney (doctor). Add four tildes like this &tilde;&tilde;&tilde;&tilde; to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Robert Maloney (doctor) during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. Jayden54Bot 22:45, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
It has become apparent that your account is being used only for spamming, so it has been blocked indefinitely. Furthermore, your activity suggests that you are also associated with the accounts Yellowseven and Yellowseven77. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:43, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Robert Maloney (doctor) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Maloney (doctor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Robert Maloney (doctor)& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --- Possibly &#9742; 22:27, 24 June 2021 (UTC)