User talk:Jmcgnh/Archives/2020/12

New Page Patrol December Newsletter
Hello ,



It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to and  who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to, , and who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.
 * Year in review

has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.
 * Reviewer of the Year

As a special recognition and thank you has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.
 * NPP Technical Achievement Award

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here 18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

COI editing
I felt terrible whenone of volunteer said the draft whichi had publishes wont be approved. As its draft is not notable. Putiing paid editing was an bad option. This task is not paid cos its my volunteer took the task tast to create a wikki page for them. — visregz (talk)  (contribs)   — Preceding undated comment added 03:46, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
 * The disclosure should have no influence over whether your draft might be accepted. The draft itself was rejected because there is no sign that the company (which you described as your client) meets Wikipedia's notability requirement. I understand that your feelings might have been hurt, but the only real solution is for you to spend more time learning how Wikipedia works so that your expectations are more in line with what tends to happen here.  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 04:22, 12 December 2020 (UTC)