User talk:Jmcomstock

September 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Template:Compu-scientist-stub, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Template:Compu-scientist-stub was changed by Jmcomstock (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-09-15T21:16:41+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:16, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Olmeda
In case the article is deleted together with the talk page, here are my comments: I think you mean to delete the article under provision G7, "Author requests deletion, if requested in good faith, and provided the page's only substantial content was added by its author. (For redirects created as a result of a pagemove, the mover must also have been the only substantive contributor to the page prior to the move.) If the author blanks the page (outside user space), this can be taken as a deletion request." However, there is not a single author, so the provision does not literally apply. Given the agreement ofthe two apparent authors, I am however going to place such a tag on it, and let another administrator decide.. But I call to your attention the following: DGG (talk) 17:40, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Nobody owns an article, and, once it is started, neither you nor he can control the contents, nor can you control who does the editing. Anyone in the world who can write in English is welcome on an equal basis.
 * 2) For clearly notable people, the subjects agreement is irrelevant for a biographical article. For borderline instances, it can optionally be taken into account if there is otherwise no clear basis for decision. sometimes it is, sometimes not; it depends on the consensus.
 * 3) WP articles must be based on published sources. Thus considerations of trade secrets are irrelevant
 * 4) WP content must not be copied from other sources unless they are in the public domain or a GFDL license is given. Any published source, may however be used for information, and the content appropriately rewritten. Copyright only applies to the expression, not the content.
 * 5) For legal questions, see WP:OTRS.
 * 6) and remember our Business FAQ (which also applies to non-profit organisations)

AfD nomination of Christopher J. Olmeda
An article that you have been involved in editing, Christopher J. Olmeda, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Christopher J. Olmeda. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Nsk92 (talk) 11:12, 30 September 2008 (UTC)