User talk:Jmcrawfo/sandbox

Peer Review: Conor Walsh
I think that this article could have quite a bit added. The current main lack, noted at the top of the page, is the lack of supplemental sources. I think adding some of those to help contextualize the movement you're discussing would help. I noted that the edits you made were good, but that one was a correction from British English to American English (organises vs. organizes). This can be a bit of an issue if every single instance of British English in your article isn't changed to American English, and could deviate from what the article was originally like. I also noticed that one of the citations you added appears to be broken.

I think that this article is still rather barren but could be rounded out with the addition of not just citations, but images from the group as well. I'm interested to see how you might be able to round this out.

Conor walsh1 (talk) 03:39, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Reply to Peer Review From Connor Walsh:

Thank you for your feedback Connor! I agree with everything you have had written about my article so far. I have been working on finding many supplemental sources, pictures, and various other data to include in this article so it will help to "round out" the article. Moreover i agree that the article is barren but i plan to include a variety of outside data/sources which i think will make a big difference. Thank you for your feedback once again !! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmcrawfo (talk • contribs) 00:12, 29 November 2018 (UTC)