User talk:Jmerelo

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:APW01SM.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:AP WIKIPEDIA 001 SM.jpg. The copy called Image:AP WIKIPEDIA 001 SM.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 02:00, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:APW01SM.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:APW01SM.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 03:25, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

bio
Hi, I can appreciate the desire to remove an entry when unacceptable changes occur, however it is better to keep the entry online and reject the unacceptable changes. Now that this page has come to my attention, I will keep an eye on it to ensure it complies with our Biography of Living People policy, which stipulates that these pages must be "cautiously" written. John Vandenberg (talk) 04:42, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Anthony Pratt, Himself is asking to remove it, This was a living person's biography on 2/21/2008 when less than desirable comments were posted. please let me know as soon as you can, in the mid time I will have to revert the changes. Thank you.--Jmerelo (talk) 12:24, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

You are referring to these comments. Those comments were removed on March 10. John Vandenberg (talk) 06:23, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Those are the comments, I know they are not harsh, but Anthony Pratt really wants to take the article off. Is this possible and what proof do you need? you can see on the history I added this on Oct-02-07. Any help on this matter is appreciated.--Jmerelo (talk) 11:36, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

We do not remove biographies on request by the subject - we keep or remove biographies based on the criteria of "notability", and Anthony Pratt easily meets those criteria, so the biography will be more than likely kept in spite of any efforts to remove it. As I have pointed out, I am keeping a close eye on this biog, with the intent of ensuring those silly comments are removed quickly if they re-appear. John Vandenberg (talk) 15:12, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

ok, we will trust the "watching", is it possible to at least retire the picture? we will upload other after a period of time, thanks for the effort.--Jmerelo (talk) 16:26, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Closedmouth (talk) 07:14, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Anthony Pratt (businessman)
A tag has been placed on Anthony Pratt (businessman) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LordKenTheGreat (talk) 22:21, 17 March 2008 (UTC)