User talk:Jmg999

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Problems at Cody Ko
I just stopped by to let you know that those two links you edited should have been removed outright along with the content they're supposed to support because they are not reliable enough for a biography; please see WP:DEXERTO and WP:RSREDDIT for details. Happy editing! –Skywatcher68 (talk) 19:50, 10 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Fair enough. Thank you.  I just saw that they weren't formatted properly, so I changed that rather than critiquing the value of the sources, which, in retrospect, I should have done.  I am curious, though, in regard to the Reddit link, it wasn't a comment from a user.  It was a video of Cody Ko uttering the n-word in a stream some years ago.  Is that still considered an invalid source of information solely based on where it was posted? Jmg999 (talk) 21:28, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I believe videos on Reddit are subject to the same guidelines established at WP:RSPYOUTUBE.  –Skywatcher68 (talk) 17:32, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for that link. I could see where this might fall under a copyright violation, but it seems that a video clearly originating from the subject in question should be offered some validity.  It was reported elsewhere, albeit w/ the similar sources of proof, but Ko also apologized for what was in those videos, lending some credence to their authenticity.  Is there a way to open this discussion to a larger community consensus, b/c I believe that using someone's own content should considered valid, even if it doesn't necessarily originate from them. Jmg999 (talk) 20:02, 12 June 2024 (UTC)