User talk:Jmigs17

Speedy deletion nomination of Stephanie Sequeira
Hello Jmigs17,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Stephanie Sequeira for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Meatsgains (talk) 01:30, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Stephanie Sequeira


A tag has been placed on Stephanie Sequeira requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Tagishsimon (talk) 02:18, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Stephanie S article
Hi Jmigs17. I don't think the person is notable enough for an article. Please don;t take it personally. It may be useful to you to read WP:N and especially WP:BIO to see the sorts of things we're looking for. You might want to take a copy of the article and put it in your sandbox, lest it be deleted - you can at least work on it there without fear it will be deleted, until you are sure it passes notability requirements. thanks --Tagishsimon (talk) 03:54, 28 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Good. Make sure you keep the sandbox version up-to-date ... I still don't think it meets the cut, but I do hope you get it to the required grade. Good luck. --Tagishsimon (talk) 04:18, 28 November 2016 (UTC)