User talk:Jmkleeberg

Allan Bloom
I really don't remember why I edited it out to be honest, from a quick look now at the end summary difference, it seems at least much of it I actually wrote-

In it, Ravelstein is clearly based on Allan Bloom and the novel relates Bloom's many interesting personal characteristics, including his homosexuality -- something Bloom himself never spoke of publicly. One may gather from his silence that he found it unnecessary to his thought or purpose as a teacher or philosopher. Even while authoring his last work Love and Friendship (Bloom), Bloom did not touch upon his private love life. In some sense this silence, a forgetting of the body, is distincly part of Bloom's educational approach.

but I am not really certain why i would have taken it out except that it is too much of an opinion (mine, I suppose) and the article should strive for 'objectivity'. I think it is better if you go ahead and add any new material since I think an article gets better the more people bring their perspective. --Mikerussell 16:30, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Inquiry
You claim that the Anabolic steroid article exhibits qualities of WP:OWN and WP:NPOV. This is untrue. You should really take a look at the articles talk page as well as the articles history just to see the number of users who contribute to it. Both Tim Vickers and alteripse have greatly contributed to the article as well as numerous others. Both the articles talk page and history section make this obvious if the time were taken to look at either. You claim the article is not WP:NPOV? Please elaborate. The article uses only the most reliable resources from primary or secondary sources and mentions both the side effects as well as the myths about side effects. The side effects section is one of the LONGEST sections in the article. Or are you claiming that the article is bias against Steroids?  Wikidudeman  (talk) 16:24, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Clifford Duffy
Clifford Duffy, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Clifford Duffy satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Clifford Duffy and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Clifford Duffy during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Hammer1980 ·talk 00:48, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

numismatics
If you are the numismatist John M. Kleeberg, would be pleased if you were to add any updates to the John Ford story to either the Kleeberg/Buttrey site, or suitable location in Wikipedia.

Never been a numismatist, but stumbled onto that story and have found it quite interesting. Publius3 (talk) 00:19, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of The Quarry at La Quinta
I have nominated The Quarry at La Quinta, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/The Quarry at La Quinta. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. [ roux  ] [ x ] 07:34, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Panic of 1907
Sorry, I didn't at all intend to imply that you addition was vandelism. The reason I reverted is because I think the fact is fairly trivial to the main text, and because I am in general not in favour of such "in litratuture" ot in "popular culture". A huge amout of very trivia associations are added each day, and my usual policy is shoot on sight. It would seem I was hasty in this case, and if I caused offence, I apologise. We might take this up on the article's talk. Ceoil (talk) 20:56, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

WP:Hornbook -- a new WP:Law task force for the J.D. curriculum
Andrew Gradman talk/WP:Hornbook 20:44, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Richard Marin (investment banker)
I have nominated Richard Marin (investment banker), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Richard Marin (investment banker). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:45, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Pamela Bach for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pamela Bach is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pamela Bach until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LADY LOTUS • TALK 17:25, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of The Quarry at La Quinta for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Quarry at La Quinta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Quarry at La Quinta & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LADY LOTUS • TALK 17:42, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Lawyers and law students' signatures needed for Supreme Court amicus brief in favor of publishing the law
Hello, given your userbox I thought you might be interested in helping Carl Malamud's case for the public domain, crucial also for Wikisource: https://boingboing.net/2019/04/25/happy-law-day.html. Best regards, Nemo 21:06, 25 April 2019 (UTC)