User talk:Jmlk17/Archive16

Restoring to Sandbox...
That triad securities article... you were going to restore it? Can you link to "where"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Simultaneous (talk • contribs) 14:40, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Muhammad
My suggestion would be remove the name of Prophet Muhammad (SAW) from the caption and just write Muslims pray like this. We are living in a freedom os speach world but hurting other's feeling is not the right way of freedom of speach. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.82.217.133 (talk) 22:12, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Beg your pardon? Jmlk  1  7  22:21, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I agree with you guys/gals. ArbCom wouldn't take this 'image dispute' case. Article protection/semi-protection is the calmest & most effective method. No matter what the consensus is? It must be respected and upheld. GoodDay (talk) 15:29, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Right on. Working together will be the best option. :)  Jmlk  1  7  18:38, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Lodongus the mohammed pictures aint going anywhere and stop crying youwhiny muslim  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.197.208.168 (talk) 17:21, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Maybe you could do a bit better of a job paying attention and seeing my edits, and you could figure out where I stand on the issues next time. Jmlk  1  7  18:38, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

valiant fan projects deletion
Magnus.ramstrom (talk) 17:58, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

This is new to me. Sorry if I do all wrong. I just discovered that the entry "valiant fan projects" is gone and was directed here. I wonder what is the procedure for it to be brought back. Some info: Valiant Fan Projects is a concept notable among comic collectors, mainly those collecting Valiant comics. The article that has disappeared is referenced from the Valiant Comics article. I personally noticed it was gone when researching a question asked on a message board.

Best,

Magnus

Here's a little bump. For notoriety of fan projects, please see articles on fandom and fanzines. For Valiant projects specifically, please see http://www.valiantcomics.com Magnus.ramstrom (talk) 14:22, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Hey there Magnus! The company/fan site is a good start, but third-party sites and sources help out a lot more as well.  Jmlk  1  7  21:43, 16 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Know what? After finding some minor references at the obvious places (the concerned charities and comic forums), I searched on and actually found all info I need at answers.com. So I have what I need and I have learned a bit about the Wikipedia procedures. I settle for that. Magnus.ramstrom (talk) 14:39, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator elections
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14! Kirill 03:21, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Prod deletions
Hello, just a brief note to let you know that when you delete prods you need to give an informative deletion reason. "Prod left uncontested for five days" really isn't at all informative. Regards, RMHED (talk) 02:39, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Whoa
No comment. Missed your message on IRC, but am there now. - Rjd0060 (talk) 04:27, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Yon
Could I get this restored to my userspace? Any version would be fine (best preferred, obviously). Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H20) 09:13, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
 * It's been restored to your sandbox. :) Jmlk  1  7  14:34, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. dihydrogen monoxide (H20) 07:40, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Servis
Thankyou for restoring Servis. It was deleted again before I had a chance to add to the article! (I have gathered about 30 references about the company demonstrating notability) Could you restore it to my userspace so I can start work on it again please. CustardJack (talk) 10:00, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
 * It's been restored to your userbox sandbox here. Jmlk  1  7  22:14, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Kenneth Stenild
Hello, could you please revert the deleting of Kenneth Stenild, as he played two senior games for AaB in the UEFA Intertoto Cup 2007 in July 2007, and thus is "notable" enough to warrant an individual article. Poulsen (talk) 14:38, 8 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I take it you are not going to answer me at all? Poulsen (talk) 09:04, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Restored, but take a look at WP:BIO if you would. Jmlk  1  7  09:07, 14 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you. Though I'm not 100% sure, I am pretty confident I have never started articles on footballers who are not professionals. But I have generally chosen to spend time improving these articles (such as Kenneth Stenild, who has signed a professional contract btw, even though he has only fairly recently gotten his debut) instead of nominating them for deletion. Poulsen (talk) 22:54, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

page deleted
why was my page " blind mans bluff ( movie ) deleated! i own all thr rigths since i help make it and we share it.I got all the pictures and thiers nothing bad 23:00 8/2/2008 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.40.113.239 (talk • contribs) 16:01, February 8, 2008
 * Lack of notability. Jmlk  1  7  23:04, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

I AM NOT
i am not advertiseing --Daryl274 (talk) 00:43, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Sure ya were. Jmlk  1  7  02:05, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Daryl274
Although I agree that this user's contributions are problematic, they don't actually seem to be vandalism. He seems not to get it, although I think that means we should try and make him get it, rather than banishing him. Would you consider shortening the block? - Revolving Bugbear  14:00, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm fine with it. I leave it to your discretion if you like. :)  Jmlk  1  7  01:41, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Please restore Zhu Xiao Dong
You deleted Zhu Xiao Dong. I think the awards and association position mentioned in the article asserted notability. As well, the Google scholar search at http://scholar.google.ca/scholar?as_q=&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=any&as_sauthors=Zhu+Xiao+Dong&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_allsubj=some&as_subj=med&hl=en&lr=&safe=off suggests that he might be notable. Perhaps someone who reads Chinese might be able to fix the article. --Eastmain (talk) 06:41, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Alright. Jmlk  1  7  06:42, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

RFA thanks
  .: RFA thanks :.

Alimustafakhan
I see that you have just indefblocked as a vandalism-only account. Isn't that a bit harsh? What the user did might qualify as pov-pushing, soapboxing or original research, but vandalism? And a vandalism-only account? This user has been around for almost three years, and hasn't had a single block before. Surely a temporary block would have been more appropriate? A ecis Brievenbus 00:40, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Aw dammit... you're right! That is my mistake.  That's what I get for multi-tasking.  Thank you my friend! :) .  Jmlk  1  7  00:42, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Dr. Paul Dhinakaran
You restored it, then speedied it? :S Sorry, just a bit confused. Master of Puppets  Call me MoP! ☺  03:10, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah... I thought I could have made a mistake, and just to make sure, I left it up to another admin.  Jmlk  1  7  03:11, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * FWIW, the subject's highly notable as a prominent evangelist and vice-chancellor of a university. (Also spelled Dinakaran.) Relata refero (talk) 10:33, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Coffeehouse
Bigdaddysun (talk) 07:02, 11 February 2008 (UTC) Red Herring Coffeehouse

The Red Herring is a non-profit institution that has a significant history of social action activities and arts programming for more than 40 years. It is not a for-profit company or corporation. "The Free Speech Movement" did much organization here in the fifties and The Students for a Democratic Society in the 60's. Many well known musicians and Filmmakers also have been a part of this place. Do not delete this page!
 * Please see our notability guidelines. Jmlk  1  7  07:42, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

MS Riverdance
Hi, you deleted the talk page, but the article still exists. Gwernol had to delete the article in order to re-create it with the history intact as it kept getting redirected to M/S Riverdance by editors who had had no input into the article and did not discuss the proposed move. Can you undelete the talk page please? Mjroots (talk) 08:08, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * My apologies... of course. Jmlk  1  7  08:10, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Islamophobia
Hi Jmlk17, you protected the article Islamophobia some time ago (16 Jan). While attempts towards dispute resolution have been partially successful, there has been a substantial lack of recent talk page activity, even though I have been requesting feedback on new compromise attempts. In the light of the talk page discussion having dried up, would it be okay to have the article unprotected so I can see how the new proposed lead floats, and so that editing to the article can be resumed? Regards,  ITAQALLAH   21:22, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Done my friend. I don't like having articles fully protected any longer than necessary.  Best of luck! :)  Jmlk  1  7  22:49, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Please restore "TOAS Nabard- The Persian Art of Combat" that was deleted
Please restore the page "TOAS Nabard- The Persian Art of Combat" which was deleted via a (prod) tag on 01/19/08.

I appreciate your time an efforts.

Metalmilitian (talk) 00:27, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Is there any particular reason why it should be restored? Are you able to give good, third-party sources or notability?  Jmlk  1  7  02:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your quick respnse. The reason we want the page restored is that TOAS Nabard is a form of martial art that Master Safakhoo developed over his life and has been teaching to others for more than 25 years in the US. Through Wiki, we hope that others will come to understand that TOAS Nabard is unique and that not only are there punches, kicks, and grabs, but deeper within is a reason and a understanding of each which can be linked to an ancient persian philosphy and belief. Through these beliefs and approaches, we not only better ourselves physically, we also better understand ourselves on a wholistic basis.

Thank you, Metalmilitian (talk) 02:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I understand your goals, but what notability does this TOAS Nabard- The Persian Art of Combat have? Jmlk  1  7  03:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

This is what we are attempting to accomplish...The notability of TOAS Nabard. We are trying to inform others of the history of the Persian Art of Combat and relate it to the TOAS Nabard way for the general user seeking more information through Wikipedia. It is very hard to establish notability when the subject you are referring to is unique. I hope this helps with your question.

-edit- Please follow this link where you will find that TOAS Nabard and Master Safakhoo have been interviewed by Budo International Magazine and the local Pensacola News Journal. Both of these articles should lend notibility to this wikipage -end edit-

Thanks - Metalmilitian (talk) 00:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Alright... I shall restore it to your sandbox for the time being... that way, you can work on the article unimpeded until you choose to publish it to the site again. You may find it here my friend.   Jmlk  1  7  04:02, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Very much appreciated! Metalmilitian (talk) 04:12, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Isle of Thieves
Okay, so you deleted my page very soon, it was a work in progress. How can I post information about this band? I have a verifiable source, from a site called Sonicbirds.com and I have a direct contact with the band to have more supporting documentation available. Should I create a word file first before posting? This is not an advertisement for the band. They have had live performances and professional studio development and mastering.

I'm new to this as well, so please bare that in mind. Apiotuch (talk) 09:58, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * What is notable about this band? Jmlk  1  7  05:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

page deleted
Hello jmlk17, can you tell me what was done wrong with my posting? I would like to make the changed needed to fit the format needed by wiki. I am unable to find much info about the usc ibear program, I am a graduate and thought it would be great to post some info about it. The program is ranked by all major business school sites--us news, financial times, bus week. I am not trying to put up an ad, though, I did add the admissions page and maybe this was the issue. I would be happy to remove that link, it is not needed at all...I only added it because I was trying to copy other univ.'s formats. There are many other univ. with info about thier ranked individual programs on wiki. I hope that I can add the info about ibear program too.

Thank you for your time...I love the site. dylan p Dylanp (talk) 10:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Hey there Dylan. Unfortunately, the way the page was situated, it seemed to be an advertisement for the program itself.  Jmlk  1  7  05:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I will take another crack at it, I took the info from their website so I am sure it sounded too much like their program ad. I have done a little reading about how to create a page, and will try to create an unbias version.  Thanks for the help Jmlk17.  All the best. Dylanp (talk) 08:19, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Best of luck! Jmlk  1  7  08:40, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Keratoconus semi-prot request/IP block
Thanks for this. It's a shame really, as he did appear to have something to say and to know about the subject, but he has been intent on this path. Hopefully we can succeed in engaging him in dialogue on his return. Regards, &mdash; BillC talk  —Preceding comment was added at 18:29, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I hope so too... very welcome as well. Best of luck! :)  Jmlk  1  7  22:32, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Sectioned
Dear Mr.Jmlk17,

I was creating an interesting and true biographic article in Wikipedia on the 11th of Feb 2008. It took about 2 hrs for me to create this authentic article as an official biographer of a leading educationist in India. But soon I was plugged off from wikipedia and my article that contained 100% correct references were delected stating vandalism. If this is the case for an authentic biographer, I do not know how you treat commoners and real vandalists. Not a word that i wrote was untrue or in a way to reduce the credibility of Wikipedia. Then you can introduce a payment mode whereby people who want them to have their profiles in ur website can pay and do so. I think this doesn't contributes to your objective of having a perfect encyclopedia. Your action is unfortunate and unjustified. I am not angry but only feel that I wasted 2 hrs on writing this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Livingston Madras (talk • contribs) 22:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Hello! First off, sorry for the issues... I don't want to make you feel unwelcome.  Unfortunately, I don't know if your article is set with our notability guidelines.  If you disagree (I don't blame you if you do), there are a number of options for us to use to get it all figured out.  Fell free to reply here, or email me using the link on my userpage.  Hope to hear from you soon! :)  Jmlk  1  7  22:42, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for unprotecting my article
I really appreciate what you guys are doing in the Wikipedia. I will keep an eye on that Voodoo Tiki article, in order to keep it clean. Thanks again for your time! :)

--Ubzy (talk) 02:04, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Very welcome. Happy editing! :)  Jmlk  1  7  02:42, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Images with political content
Hi Jmlk17,

I'd like to request for help:

Please take a look at this section in Anger article:. It is my belief that adding political-flavored images to articles that are not notable or known for any political issue is not appropriate. The concept of anger itself is rather independent of politics; If the images were notable (they are not), they were only justified to represent the concept of anger in the context of politics (but there is no such section there); and lastly the image is not historically notable; there are thousands of images available on the internet that do not have political flavor but represent the matter and I believe there are already such images in the article. Since User:David Shankbone had added such images to many many articles such as Body language, Gesture, Index finger, Type of gesture, Logical argument, Eye contact, Staring, originally I thought this is a violation of WP:POINT as well (but I don't think this is so anymore; maybe a conflict of interest causing (WP:COI) favoring of those images). Could you please help with this. Thank you very much. --Be happy!! (talk) 04:18, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Please also review the discussion over this issue on my Talk page. The editor thinks that the circumstances for a photo are an issue, when they only need illustrate the concept.   I am judging that given Aminz/Be happy!!'s edit history, he has an issue that it was an Ahmadinejad protest, but it does not matter per the WP:IMAGE guidelines.  If he has an issue with an image he should raise it on each talk page.  -- David  Shankbone  04:28, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I have the concern that it is related to politics. --Be happy!! (talk) 04:31, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Jmlk17, [[User:David Shankbone] has posted a post on another admin's talk page . Cheers, --[[User:Aminz|Be happy!!]] (talk) 04:43, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment, I am not particularly interested in the issue, I just happened to notice the situation while on patrol. I will give my opinion only this once on this subject and that is all. I do not believe that the image has any political insinuation. I believe that the image properly reflects the topic in the section of the article which is the expression of anger, in this case amongst two groups. Therefore, the image is revenant to the section of the article. This should not be turned into a big deal. That is all and Thank you. Tony the Marine (talk) 06:52, 18 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi Jmlk17,
 * I have brought this to ANI because of the large number of articles involved . Cheers, --Be happy!! (talk) 07:06, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up. :) Jmlk  1  7  07:07, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Madeleine McCann
You've SP'd the Madeleine McCann article. I think you need to look more closely at this article and its history before excluding just one party in the "edit war". By semi-protecting this article you have excluded the anonymous user (and all others) while leaving the small cabal of editors who control the article to do as they want. I haven't the time or the inclination to examine all of the disputed requests for citation, but I did look at just two, refs 146 and 147. These were the first I came across and I have to say that the sources are not good. In fact they do not in any way back up the statements being made about criticism of the parents. The anonymous user is correct to ask for a citation in these two cases at least. The onus should then be on "the article owners" (Harry the Dog, TerriersFan etc) to source those remarks or remove them. You might like to consider either removing SP or fully-protecting the article. As it stands, it appears that the IP is being excluded just becuase he's an IP editor. 82.20.28.142 (talk) 14:23, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I believe you may be right... to a point. The IPs (there were a couple) seemed to be unwilling to move to a talk page about the issue, and seemed to be getting quite "fired up" during the whole issue.  Irregardless, I have lowered the semiprotection for the time being, as I don't want to exclude anyone.  Thanks for the time. :)  Jmlk  1  7  22:10, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks for looking at it again. 82.20.28.142 (talk) 22:13, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Of course. Jmlk  1  7  22:14, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Muhammad/images
What you removed in was not a "theological discussion". It pertained to the topic at hand and directly to comments made that have not been removed. My comment regarding the differences in doctrine regarding images, icons, and depictions in general is replies directly Kaldari's question of "why Christians don't care that Jesus is depicted and Muslims care if Muhammed is". How do you plan to answer that question if not with a brief explanation of doctrine? My comment to Armanaziz replies directly to his general complaint that the images are unimportant (at least that's what he seems to be saying). I realize I off the rails yesterday, but I was on the right-of-way still. Today I'm on the rails. Put it back pls... -MasonicDevice (talk) 22:37, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Done.  Jmlk  1  7  22:41, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'd have done it myself, but figured I owed the explanation. -MasonicDevice (talk) 22:47, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Definitely... hope you understood where I was coming from at least. :) Jmlk  1  7  22:48, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * For sure. I was trying to be a laser - direct and coherent - but ended up being a heat lamp. :-P -MasonicDevice (talk) 22:51, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Lol! It happens! :) Jmlk  1  7  22:53, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

MIPRO
Hi Jmlk17, MIPRO is a Taiwan-based wireless microphone company; recently lanuches industry first digital wireless microphone system. Thus, I'd like to edit MIPRO in Wikipedia; however, this title has been protected. Can you help to unprotect and edit it? (If you need detailed information, I am willing to contribute it). Thanks and I am looking forward to hearing from you soon. Ccdavid (talk) 06:11, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Hiya Ccdavid and welcome! Unfortunately, the MIPRO article has been protected as being a spam article by User:Daniel Case.  My suggestion would be to contact him on his talk page, as he would probably know the situation better than me.   Jmlk  1  7  06:19, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Bob's
Hello, I noticed that you deleted the article Bob's. Can you please undelete it? I will prove that it is notable. Editorofthewiki (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 20:41, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Mind if I ask how? :) Jmlk  1  7  22:22, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

 * Welcome... best of luck! :) Jmlk  1  7  10:25, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Doczilla's RfA

 * Hah! Good times... best of luck!  Jmlk  1  7  10:26, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Hans Köchler
Could you, as the protecting admin, have a look at the end of the talkpage? It appears a consensus has emerged that the the consequences of a damaging edit war should be rolled back. Relata refero (talk) 08:43, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I'd like a reply on your intentions, please, before I go to WP:RFPP. Relata refero (talk) 18:44, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delay... gets a bit busy 'round here. :) If you guys are happy with the consensus, I'm happy. I'll be more than willing to remove the protection for you guys, or RFPP may be a bit quicker, as things are a bit hectic for me as this moment. Jmlk  1  7  22:26, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Don't worry about it! I'll take it to WP:RFPP. Relata refero (talk) 11:13, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Chasing Ghosts
Hello. The band you deleted, has many of the requirements listed by wikipedia. The referencing are included on the page. There is no reason why you should have deleted it.
 * Notability (or rather, lack thereof). Jmlk  1  7  11:06, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Whoa
Yeah dude, it sucks. I don't know whats going on here, but if they don't shape up I'm gonna have to go down there. lol - Rjd0060 (talk) 15:46, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Trade deadline'll fix it for you guys. :) Jmlk  1  7  23:58, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The losing streak ends tonight! - Rjd0060 (talk) 16:36, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah... ours! :) Jmlk  1  7  21:29, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Smiley.svg|18px]] - Rjd0060 (talk) 01:59, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Milhist coordinators election has started

 * The February 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates.  Please vote here by February 28. -- R OGER D AVIES   talk 23:32, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Dr. Michael Newton article
You deleted the article before giving me a chance to indicate notability. I was updating the talk page with more explanation and reference. could you please explain why the deletion was so fast? —Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexGWU (talk • contribs) 03:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Does the Dr. have any notability? :) Jmlk  1  7  03:56, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

This article meets the notability criteria:

In 1998 he received the annual award for the "Most Unique Contribution" from the National Association of Transpersonal Hypnotherapists.

He is one of the first scientists using a scientific approach for over 40 years of clinical research and practice to discover and explain soul experiences.AlexGWU (talk) 03:45, 17 February 2008 (UTC)AlexGWU (talk) 04:12, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Maybe I didn't understand your response. Is the issue having the Dr. in front of the name in the article??AlexGWU (talk) 06:12, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * That's understandable Alex, as he does seem to have some notability. Are there any third-party sources?  Jmlk  1  7  22:24, 17 February 2008 (UTC)


 * In 2001 he was a winner of the annual Independent Publishers Book Award for Destiny of Souls. He has also been on many TV and radio talk shows. Some of these interview recordings can be found online.AlexGWU (talk) 00:07, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

JMlk, is there something else required? I have not heard back from youAlexGWU (talk) 01:37, 19 February 2008 (UTC) Yes please do that AlexGWU (talk) 03:32, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Whoops, lost your reply in the clutter around here. Would you like me to restore the article to your sandbox, so you can work on it unimpeded?  Jmlk  1  7  01:39, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Done... it is located at your personal sandbox User:AlexGWU/sandbox.  Jmlk  1  7  19:05, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

RFA Card
My RFA →→→   

Dear Jmlk17, here is a little note to say thank you for your kind vote on my request for adminship which succeeded with a final result of (29/5/5).

I understand why you voted oppose, and I will take the advice that you have given. And now that I am a sysop, I will work hard to improve the encyclopedia with my new editing tools. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any queries you have. I would be glad to help you along with the other group of kind and helpful administrators.

Thank you again and I look forward to editing alongside you in the future. &mdash; Chetblong T  C 21:06, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Muhammad
Talk:Muhammad should also be semi-protected from IP addresses. Too much page blanking going on. Thoughts? - &#10032; ALLSTAR &#10032; echo 00:49, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I dunno... I agree that a short-term protection might be beneficial, but to protect a talk page really does take away the whole "anyone can edit" thing entirely... but if it has to be done, it has to! Jmlk  1  7  06:58, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

I can has thankspam?
  Quick, let's delete the front page!


 * Hah, welcome. Best of luck! :)  Jmlk  1  7  09:15, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Muhammad Protection
Please remove the protection from Muhammad and follow PROT ("Administrators should not protect or unprotect a page [...] if they are in any way involved in the dispute.") There is a strong evidence, that you are indeed involved:. If User:Rauf-abdul violated WP:3RR you can block the user, but that's no reason to protect the page. Besides, we are currently building a new consensus on WikiEN-l. --Raphael1 23:38, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Replied to your email. Jmlk  1  7  09:28, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Muhammad Talk Page
That is certainly not an inappropriate discussion. Why are you deleting my messages there? If you continue this, i will report you to higher admin. Xubayr MA Talk 09:58, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * It's not a place for general discussion... report me to whomever you please! Jmlk  1  7  10:00, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

RE:Zwuh?
Haha, I figured I would AGF on your part, even though your edits are rarely ever constructive :P lol – Gonzo fan2007  talk ♦ contribs 17:33, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Lol, I try my best though! :) Jmlk  1  7  21:29, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Well sometimes that's not enough, I mean come on, vandals try their best too... muhahahaha :P lol. – Gonzo fan2007  talk ♦ contribs 00:27, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh my, I think they out-do us sometimes even. :) Jmlk  1  7  00:29, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Hahaha this is very true, I have to say they definitely have better imaginations...well at least some of them do haha. – Gonzo fan2007  talk ♦ contribs 23:04, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Restoring RLM Software
Hello Jmlk 17, it looks like you deleted the entry on RLM Software on Jan 17th after a PROD request went uncontested for 5 days.

Can you let me know why it was deleted? I'm asking that you restore it based on its relevance to FAA Air Traffic Control initiatives.

Thanks FlightTracker (talk) 21:32, 18 February 2008 (UTC)2/18/08
 * Hey there! I deleted the article after it's PROD tag expired... for a better explanation than I could probably give you, check out PROD.  Hope that helps! :)  Jmlk  1  7  21:35, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

RFA
Hey, I saw that recently you changed from neutral to a weak oppose. I don't want to come off as aggressive, but may I ask why you decided to change? It would be helpful to know what was the deciding factor so I can improve upon that. Thank you very much. Icestorm815 •  Talk  01:28, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Hey there Ice! You're not being aggressive at all, so no worries.  I am more than willing to explain any of my actions here at any time.  In regards to your question, I changed after a chance to dig a bit deeper into your contributions.  I'm not exactly the best of article-builders myself, but I like to see admins with a bit more experience in that general area.  You seem to have a widespread interest in a bunch of areas; may I suggest you find one you really enjoy and focus on working on it for a bit?  I have the utmost confidence in your working towards building your credentials, and I am confident of a support !vote in your next Rfa my friend.  Jmlk  1  7  01:33, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for the quick reply. I'll make an honest effort to try and develop an article before I try again. As for the aggressive part, I've ran into a couple of hot headed people before, so I've had to develop a highly diplomatic style of writing to make sure they keep their cool. Now I'm practically talking to everyone like that! :) Anyways, thanks again, and tell the cabal I'll see them soon! Cheers, Icestorm815  •  Talk  01:41, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Very welcome... best of luck! :) Jmlk  1  7  01:42, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Josh Cobb
Can you explain the semi-protection decline? I ask because I'd read the policy where it said,    * Pages subject to significant but temporary vandalism or disruption, for example due to media attention, when blocking individual users is not a feasible option. which seemed to fit here. The IP and now a 2nd are doing nothing but vandalising the page. Am I missing something? Travellingcari (talk) 19:31, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Are you referring to the redirect, or the Legacy Five article? Jmlk  1  7  19:33, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * the re-direct. Legacy Five is fine and having much constructive editing after I tagged it to the right projects for help. Special:Contributions/70.185.238.178's sole contributions have been vandalising the re-direct (it's not a content dispute by any means) and now another IP got in on it. I thought semi would be good until the IP got bored, but I wasn't sure that's why I asked. Travellingcari (talk) 20:16, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Right on... I looked back, and there's no reason for the redirect to be edited (hence your request lol), so I have protected it for the time being. :) Jmlk  1  7  20:17, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, wanted to make sure I wasn't misunderstanding something since this was my first time listing a page for protection. Travellingcari (talk) 20:22, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * No worries... happy editing! Jmlk  1  7  20:23, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

OhanaUnited's RFA
  .: Thank you! :.
 * Very welcome... best of luck! :) Jmlk  1  7  23:06, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

please undelete Julio Bermejo
Hi, Jmlk17 I would ask that you please restore my new page about Julio Bermejo. He is a very important person in the world of tequila. I tried to explain in the article, and provided links to some major publications in english that he has appeared in over the last few years. I did not elaborate more on the nature of his business endeavors for fear of the article being deleted as marketing/pr, which it is not.

I respectfully ask that you read one or more of the news article links that I provided and so you can understand that he is definitely important enough to have his own page. I am sure that over time me and other wikipedians can help flesh out more exact details of Julio and update the page accordingly. I feel strongly that it is very important that Julio's significance in the world of tequila appreciation be documented as such.

Thanks for your consideration.

playphil (talk) 23:50, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: Barnstar
I really appreciate that. Thanks Jmlk17! And thanks for the quick block on DisabledCat. He/She was going crazy vandalizing pages. Again, thanks and thanks :) - Milk's  Favorite  Cookie  01:35, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * You're welcome, and thank you! :) Jmlk  1  7  01:36, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Just beat me here. - Milk's  Favorite  <span style="font-family:Ravie;  	font-size:small; color:#4D0100">Cookie  01:46, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Perry Belcher
What do you think of this. Speedy? AfD? POV tag? Thanks,  Dloh  cierekim  Deleted?  01:40, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Ooo boy... I'd say definite SD for an attack page. Seems like someone just wants to vent about an enemy of theirs.  Jmlk  1  7  01:41, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. He does not seem to have a firm grasp of NPOV. Cheers,  Dloh  cierekim  Deleted?  01:43, 20 February 2008 (UTC) IT's gone!! Dloh  cierekim  Deleted?  01:43, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Welcome... their grasp of NPOV does seem to be lacking a bit. :) Jmlk  1  7  01:44, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Fear of crickets
Is "No research. Poorly written" really a speedy deletion criterion? Wouldn't it have been better to list for prod or something? seresin | wasn't he just...? 02:07, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Crap... I thought I had clicked the button for a "no context" deletion. :( Jmlk  1  7  02:09, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Hm. I don't think that qualifies particularly either. But anyway, not a huge deal I suppose. It is annoying to mishit a reason. seresin | wasn't he just...? 02:14, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * That it is... :) Jmlk  1  7  02:14, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Hidden Page
Here you go, Destructo.
 * Thanks :). Jmlk  1  7  02:35, 20 February 2008 (UTC)