User talk:Jmmyjam

Notable residents descriptions at Pine Bluff, Arkansas
User:Jmmyjam, A very short description, profession, etc. will suffice, there is no need to add overly flowery adjective laden spiels denoting their every accomplishment, position held or award won. Those sort of materials belong in their respective articles. Please stop adding this material back into the article.  He  iro 01:02, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I have brought this issue here Content noticeboard  He  iro 01:31, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Heironymous, stop deleting relevant identifying information about subjects. Further, their "every accomplishment" is not being cited in the short citations I have provided. However, short relevant qualifiers assist readers in distinguishing subjects. No overly flowery adjective laden spiels are being added.

All of the new information you are adding is great, but would you mind citing it to the sources from which you are obtaining it? This article is poorly referenced enough as it is and it would really help it out. If you are unsure how, here is a link Template messages/Sources of articles/Citation quick reference. I've left posts at the articles talk page, which you should check occasionally as their purpose is to allow editors to collaborate and communicate about the articles. Happy editing.  He  iro 02:33, 3 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Chiming in to say I agree with Heiro. The links are there so people can find out the details. Dougweller (talk) 19:08, 3 September 2010 (UTC)


 * You are still adding unreferenced material and have not yet referenced the other newly added material. Per WP policy, any unreferenced information can be removed. Please go back and cite your additions.  He  iro 17:50, 4 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Response to this, left on my talk page. Here is a simple way to do the citations:



you insert this immediately after the sentence of fact that you are citing. And then by placing under the ==References== header, it will show up as a number in the body of the text, and as a reference under that header. I hope this is clear and clears up this problem. For citing a website, use this
 * If you are using the same source multiple times, insert  for at the beginning of the first cite, and then just use plain old  (note the addition of the slash at the end, this is important) for all subsequent citations to this source.
 * If you are using the same source multiple times, insert  for at the beginning of the first cite, and then just use plain old  (note the addition of the slash at the end, this is important) for all subsequent citations to this source.

As for the fact that others have not done it well on this article, they should have, and its no reason to not start doing it now. The way it stands, per policy, anyone can remove the information now as uncited. I have not done so, I have merely asked you to cite your additions. As for the notable list with overlong descriptions, etc, over the last 2 days two different admins here have either a.)agreed with me ) or b.) made the same changes I suggest themselves . I noticed you reverted the last edits by User:Nyttend.  He  iro 00:01, 5 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Which you should not have done, and I've reverted you. Heiro and I, Nyttend, etc aren't here to harass you, we're trying to make a better article and to help make you a better editor. I note that you still haven't replied to my post below. Dougweller (talk) 14:20, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

I like all of the new stuff you've added and the cites, it's looking good! As you use the cites you'll get a better feel for them, it took me awhile to catch on to them too. Good luck and happy editing!  He  iro 21:18, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Per this on my talk, your welcome. Wikipedia can be a little daunting at first, and sorry if I came across badly, sometimes my bluntness is mistaken for hostility, which I never mean it to be. There are lots of rules, policies, guidelines, etc. and it does take awhile to make it through them and then even longer to collate and assimilate them. Most of the really helpful ones are contained in the welcome template someone left at the top of your page. If you have questions or need occasional advice, you can leave me a note on my talk. Also, Dougweller and Nyttend are both good admins, knowledgable about the ins and outs here and usually willing to lend a hand. Although admins on this site are considered to be ordinary editors like anyone else, albeit with a few "extra" tools. Another useful tip, instead of signing you actual name, sign " ~ ", and the software will automatically sign and date stamp your posts on talkpages. It makes it a lot easier to see who said what and when in the longer conversations. Here is another useful citation, for use with encyclopedias:




 * There are more useful ones at that first link I left you, Template messages/Sources of articles/Citation quick reference, which has slightly different versions for articles in larger publications, journals, etc. Once you've used the first few example I've left you a few times, you will probably get the general pattern and be able to figure the others out pretty easily. Some of them have 15 or so fields, dont worry, they still work without them, just make sure the important fields such as title, author, dates, accessdate, etc. are there. All of that extra stuff is there in case you need to include volumes, issues, and all of the other info, but it insnt necessary in every case, such as a book, which has name, author, page, title, and isbn is pretty much all you need. For instance, books dont need the url, but if your using say an online copy at Googlebooks, it might be useful to include it. Anyway, happy editing and looking good.  He  iro 02:04, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

John Horse
I've reverted your edit. Besides the fact that you deleted with no explanation (and if you don't use edit summaries, anyone may revert your edits simply because you haven't explained them) his advising Osceola, what you added has, according to its proponent Amateur historian JB Bird, no reliable source as it's not accepted by scholars. Thus it doesn't belong in our article. Don't take this personally, new editors aren't expected to understand all our policies and guidelines, but this is part of fundamental policy, you need reliable sources - see WP:RS. Dougweller (talk) 19:12, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=574958250 your edit] to Miles Davis may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:26, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
 * a substantial ranch in the Delta region of Arkansas near the city of Pine Bluff, Arkansas, where Davis's father and grandfather were from. It was in both East St. Louis, Illinois and

Arkansas Delta
Hi there. I reverted a couple of your edits to this article. Both times you added unsourced information, in one instance replacing sourced information. If you could add a source to your edit that would be great. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:59, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pine Bluff, Arkansas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Brown. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pine Bluff, Arkansas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Larry Davis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)