User talk:Jmoney4769

Speedy deletion nomination of Beast1333


A tag has been placed on Beast1333 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Human.v2.0 (talk) 18:33, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Beast1333
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Beast1333, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 19:09, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Beast1333. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's . Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 19:11, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

I've noticed that, while the article may not be worthy of speedy deletion, it definitely needs to be worked on. I've left some tags at the top of the page that may help; clicking on the links inside them will point you to the relevant information. The guide to writing one's first article, located in a box near the top of this talk page, is also a good resource. All this said, is Beast1333 really endorsed by Anon? I have to look into this dude's music. 21655 T/01 20:55, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

"Beast1333" Article
The article of the rapper does not merit to be notable because there is not enough resources that establish his notability. For example, Blogspot is not a reliable website, since anyone can put any content by any user and they cannot be verified to be true or not. Moreover, the Twitter feed example is not notable either because there is countless of people watching the hactivist groups and they themselves are just watching their activities. One thing that can establish notability for Beast1333 is his association with KRS-One, which can be a start to start describing his recognized actions by reliable sources and mention if he is signed by a record label. For sure, that can establish notability for that artist immediately. Hopefully this helps you out. -- Esa nchez (Talk 2 me or Sign here) 21:01, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I made a page for you to edit and to use to improve. However, it is not considered a legitimate article unless it has been improved, since it is treated as a sandbox under your user page. User:Jmoney4769/Beast1333. Everything you had is in there. -- Esa nchez (Talk 2 me or Sign here) 21:10, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

I will use the copy of the page that I have on my computer and will be posting it as a legitimate page when I finish adding information about why it is important; maybe if the section is completely in caps you will read it next time? Don't worry, every article that is slightly relevant will be included in this version

Speedy deletion nomination of Beast1333


A tag has been placed on Beast1333, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. MikeWazowski (talk) 22:00, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Beast1333


A tag has been placed on Beast1333, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Safiel (talk) 23:57, 15 August 2011 (UTC)