User talk:Jmoney819

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Seattle does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Materialscientist (talk) 22:18, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

June 2013
You recently changed some weather data at Washington, DC without giving a reason or identifying a source for the change. Your edit was inconsistent with cited source in place, so I reverted it. When you edit pages, please explain what you are doing, and why; and be sure that your edits are consistent with the sources cited in the article. Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 14:21, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The same was true for Colorado Springs, so I have reverted that as well too. And I could not locate, in the source you cited for Seattle, figures that went to the level of precision you added.  Being that all three of the edits I've checked have been wrong, and I don't have time to check every one, I am going to undo your edits.  I am sorry to undo a good bit of work but it does not seem to be reliable or accurate.  Feel free to reintroduce any or all edits once you've got the sourcing down.  Thanks.  JohnInDC (talk) 14:33, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for noting the sourcing issues at Olathe, Kansas; but when you do have a source, add the actual page to the article. "Weather.com" isn't really helpful - I could not figure out how to navigate to the Olathe, Kansas, historical data page on that site and finally just Googled it for a weather.com result.  Also, I don't agree with your conclusion that reconciling two tables in an article is just common sense, no source needed; because if the tables are different then presumably one is wrong and the other is right, and how do we know which is which without reference to a source?  Finally, I left the edit alone, because the Weather.com source that I found was consistent with it.  I guess finally what I'm saying is, thanks for tracking down the refs, and going forward please be sure to include them in the article so that it remains well sourced.  Thanks!  JohnInDC (talk) 13:34, 5 July 2013 (UTC)