User talk:Jmorby

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Flockmeal 21:27, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Regarding article Jon Morby
The article you created at Jon Morby was listed for deletion as An article about a real person that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject, criterion 7 in the criteria for speedy deletion, Articles section. Since it appears to be about you I've moved it to your user space instead, which was probably what you intended in the first place (a common mistake among newcomers!).

If you really did mean to create an article about yourself please be aware that this is often considered a bad idea, even if you do meet the guidelines for inclusion of biographies.

I know Wikipedia can be confusing for new editors, so you are welcome to ask for help at the help desk or on my talk page. -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 01:27, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

Opus-CBCS
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Opus-CBCS article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! (note: the article was reverted to an older revision). Conscious 09:59, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Hi .. actually the content was reproduced with permission of the original author, and is the "official" history of Opus-CBCS

I am the current "caretaker" of the Opus-CBCS project, so the person who has the authority to publish such works.

However .. it is becoming clear that Wikipedia is only interested in being factually incorrect, and having the minimum of "accurate" content available online.


 * Do you refer to my removal of the information? There is a way to have it inserted to Wikipedia. For this, the text must be licensed under GFDL. You can either put a notice on your site or send a letter to Wikimedia foundation confirming it. (More info on this at WP:CP.) Conscious 15:06, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Do you refer to my removal of the information? There is a way to have it inserted to Wikipedia. For this, the text must be licensed under GFDL. You can either put a notice on your site or send a letter to Wikimedia foundation confirming it. (More info on this at WP:CP.) Conscious 15:06, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Opus-CBCS
I've added the "prod" template to the article Opus-CBCS, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Opus-CBCS. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Oo7565 06:02, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Jon Morby
As this was the result of community decision, I've reenacted the redirect from the Jon Morby article to Fido.net. Pascal.Tesson 20:44, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Fido-logo-01.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Fido-logo-01.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:24, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Sad news .... it does so happen that I created that image and own the copyright for it Jmorby (talk) 11:28, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Fido.net for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fido.net is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fido.net & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Philafrenzy (talk) 20:22, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of White Label Communications Ltd for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article White Label Communications Ltd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/White Label Communications Ltd until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Someone not using his real name (talk) 05:34, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Opus-CBCS for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Opus-CBCS is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Opus-CBCS until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Someone not using his real name (talk) 16:29, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Jonmorby.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jonmorby.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 09:34, 13 May 2016 (UTC)