User talk:Jmorganmarketgrader

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kadzi (talk) 21:44, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! APerson (talk!) 02:25, 13 July 2013 (UTC)


 * further advice. I'm one of the admins particularly interested in this sort of article, and I'd like to help you get it finished. Here's what is needed:

A Wikipedia article must be written like an encyclopedia article, not a press release--don't praise the organization, say what they do. . Don't include material that would better belong in an advertisement or a web page, such as a detailed list of products or of executives or branch offices. , of of short paragraphs like a presentation on powerpoint. Remember not to copy from a web site, even your own -- first it's a copyright violation, but, even if you own the copyright and are willing to give us permission according to WP:DCM (permission that irrevocably gives everyone in the world the right to copy, reuse, and modify the material), the tone will not be encyclopedic and the material will not be suitable. (Thus, there is generally no purpose in giving permission; it is better to rewrite.) And in fact, some of this text does in fact read like it has been copied--especially the way the bio of the CEO is given.

Include only material that would be of interest to a general reader coming across the mention of the subject and wanting the sort of information that would be found in an encyclopedia. Do not include material that would be of interest only to those associated with the subject, or to prospective clients or users --that sort of content is considered promotional.

Ask me on my talk p. if you have any questions, and let me knowwhen it's ready for a second review.  DGG ( talk ) 04:04, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Barron's 400 Index, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Tazerdadog (talk) 04:56, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your article
As I'm sure you can see, I have made some fairly extensive changes to your article. I am by no means an expert on the subject, however, so if I have done anything horribly wrong, feel free to hit me up on my talk page. I see from your username that you have a conflict of interest in the article. First, thank you for disclosing that fact. This makes everyone's lives easier, and ultimately results in a better article. I would advise that you read the conflict of interest guideline carefully, and follow it. I would further recommend that you do not directly edit the article. (There are limited situations where it is OK, but in general, editing the article is a bad idea). Rather, you should use one of he requested edit templates on the talk page. Thank you for your contributions! Tazerdadog (talk) 05:32, 23 July 2013 (UTC)