User talk:Jmorley89/Evaluate an Article

Great review, Jmorley89! This is such a bizarre Wikipedia page, I didn't even realize it existed. You're absolutely right, there's no information about the actual topography of Rome because the page is supposedly about the academic field studying the topography of Rome. But that in itself is strange because, as far as I'm aware, there aren't many separate Wikipedia pages about separate academic fields of study that also lack any information about that subject whatsoever. So strange. So, are you at all tempted to improve this page because it's in such desperate need for improvement, or are you sticking to the Servian Wall? Grade: 10/10. Gardneca (talk) 13:05, 6 February 2020 (UTC)