User talk:Jmorrison230582/Archive 6

Zimmerman
Hello,

I reverted your recent edit on Zimmerman, please wait until an article is written before adding an entry for "Cyril Zimmermann, Swiss football referee." Surname article names are based for what is in Wikipedia. It is not a catch all of all things. Thank you. Jrcrin001 (talk) 23:47, 20 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Please read. WP:REDLINK
 * "Red links are frequently present in lists and sometimes in disambiguation pages or templates. Although red links to notable topics are permitted in lists and other articles, do not create lists or other pages in the mainspace solely for use as an article creation guide.  Instead, editors are encouraged either to write the article first or to use WikiProjects or user spaces to keep track of unwritten articles."


 * For example on List of people with surname Carpenter is a red linked entry, as listed below. But please notice that while there is no article on Ken Carpenter (red linked), there is a blue link for Hellraiser III. Why? Because Ken Carpenter is mentioned in the blue linked article. And the promised article on the actor is still not done. Why keep the red link? Because the actor is mentioned in Wikipedia with a potential article (hopefully) pending.
 * Ken Carpenter (actor), who appeared in Hellraiser III


 * Ask your self ... Is Cyril Zimmerman mentioned anywhere in the English Wikipedia? Is he mentioned in a Wikipedia article on Swiss football or as a Swiss football referee?  If both are no, then please wait until the article is written.  Thank you. Jrcrin001 (talk) 03:29, 21 November 2012 (UTC)


 * I added #Switzerland to the blue link. I am pleased that you found an article with his name for a blue link. But, please be active in the deletion discussion of that blue link. Two red links are not good.
 * Cyril Zimmermann, Swiss football referee
 * Jrcrin001 (talk) 16:10, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High, while for quality the scale goes from Low  to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:17, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
thanks for fixing it :) Andrewcrawford ( talk  -  contrib ) 18:36, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High, while for quality the scale goes from Low  to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:02, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Robert Dawson (footballer)


The article Robert Dawson (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Drmies (talk) 17:39, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Ibrox Stadium
Fair enough the referencing isn't adequate in my Ibrox stadium edit. But how can you say it fails WP:NPOV? What have I added that isn't referenced or isn't neutral? Most of the sections added are adapted from other parts of Wikipedia or are advancements of the current references. I have been editing it at my sandbox if you want a look, and I'll try to sort the references out fully before updating the article again.VanguardScot (talk) 23:49, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry to but in but the record fourth tier attendance is sourceable so it is not patent nonsense and a notable claim. User:VanguardScot has only been editing for a few days so maybe you could help him a little more. Blethering   Scot  00:12, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Thats a play off final not a league match and not strictly fourth tier. Either way its a sourced claim and to say to a new editor its patent nonsense without explaining why you believe it to be so is not assuming any form of good faith. I suggest you maybe take it up at the Rangers page as its firmly sources and been discussed there before. Anyhow im not fussed regarding the fact or whether its right or wrong just the way you said it to a brand new editor. Blethering  Scot  00:36, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * the only reason I added it was because of the discussion and consensus that was on the Rangers F.C. talk page. If that is the only bad part of the edit then we can leave it out if you like and I'll look to improve the references back to a good standard. (All i done was move the reference tags to the end of each paragraph so it shouldn't be too hard). I didn't remove any of the original material, just added a section on the records, updated the intro and added lots of relevant info to the history section (along with licensed photos) as it didn't have any old photos; after reading through the litrature in the further reading section. VanguardScot (talk) 00:52, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Was there anything else that you thought wasn't worthy of inclusion in my edit and I can remove it too? VanguardScot (talk) 00:52, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High, while for quality the scale goes from Low  to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:54, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High, while for quality the scale goes from Low  to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:59, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High, while for quality the scale goes from Low  to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:31, 24 March 2013 (UTC)