User talk:Jmorrison230582/Archive 7

London 2012 British Football Olympic Team
Hi You deleted my entry on this article, and yes reading again probably I didn't check spelling etc. (just too fast). But - in my opinion, and probably many viewers too, because it was quite popular topic not selecting Beckham was something worth remembering of this games. One of this was importance of the decision - Olympic football was generally considered as unpopular, for long time most of the tickets even weren't sold, something unusual, if You applied for other games tickets. Compare with the Beckham similar position to other "old stars" in team, it was something really unusual and somebody wanted to say that "You are too bad, we want the best only". Please consider discussing this with others. Then deciding with inserting correct spelling. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.74.110.154 (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Sevco 5088
Yes but now sources are showing that it was Sevco Scotland Ltd that bought the assets as proved by Duff & Phelps final interim report and Lord Nimmo Smith. D&P report and SPL Commission show no sale to Sevco 5088 and I also provided link to a 3rd party source. BadSynergy (talk) 10:05, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Derek Riordan
The sections I added in the "Personal life" of Derek Riordan was in fact mainly from your edits in 2009 and was deleted mistakely last year. And this time you deemed it as a assume good faith edit. I feel quite confused about that. Happy editing. --Alexchen4836 (talk) 18:14, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High, while for quality the scale goes from Low  to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:49, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Image of Gary Cahill (Chelsea)
Why do you delete the image of his head ?

In the infobox, I think it's better to have an image with only the head because we reconize the player. An image with all the body is so far and we don't see really his face. --Guiggz (talk) 09:15, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * You change the file too. I taked File:Gary Cahill (cropped).jpg (just the head) and you edit the actual image with all the body and we can't see really his face. That's why I don't understand why you delete "my" image ? --Guiggz (talk) 10:01, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * ("my" previous edit on 7th May and "yours" actually current version) --Guiggz (talk) 10:06, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Idea
Actually there is the picture with all the body in the infobox and a picture on back with just the number 24 in the Chelsea period. The picture with number is not good bacause we don't see anything so do you want we take the actual infobox picture on Chelsea period and we take face picture on infobox ? --Guiggz (talk) 10:14, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * OK. Before I read your message, I changed with the head picture in infobox and the body picture in text. I do the same for Éver Banega for example (body picture in infobox move in text and new head picture add in infobox).
 * Thank you for answer. --Guiggz (talk) 13:33, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High, while for quality the scale goes from Low  to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:32, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Airdrie
I saw your revertion on my edit of the logo on the Airdrieonians F.C. (2002) page, there has been confirmation that the old logo will now be used - https://twitter.com/Colin_Paterson_/status/341537113449312256 (Lbarnett-bl (talk) 13:13, 3 June 2013 (UTC))

Brian Kidd
Hello. Thanks for your feedback on Brian Kidd being included in the Manchester City managers template at WP:FOOTY, could I ask that you add your comment to Template_talk:Manchester_City_F.C._managers, as I am trying to reach a general consensuses and your input is invaluable. Thanks JMHamo (talk) 19:19, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:


 * Views/Day : Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
 * Quality : Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:


 * Content : Is more content needed?
 * Headings : Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
 * Images : Is the number of illustrative images about right?
 * Links : Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
 * Sources : For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:42, 17 June 2013 (UTC)