User talk:Jmrizo/sandbox

Kate's Peer Review
So far the research looks great - my biggest concern right now is just citations! To my understanding, basically all information needs to be cited, and theres a way to do it do that it automatically goes down in your references, and you can re-use existing ones easily. Wiki basically just makes the citation for you if you have a link - it's in one of the trainings! :)

Material wise, I am interested in hearing more about the corruption scandal involving embezzlement of gov money - I think the operating agreements section could also use some more information in general. The information in the political implication section looks great - I recommend breaking it up, possibly into 'domestic changes' and 'conflict', and adding more information in those areas as well.

Overall, looks great!! Katemalone99 (talk) 01:15, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Farah's peer review
I overall really enjoyed reading this article and thought it was very educational when it came to exploring the political implications of the industry affected foreign aid and profits. The article did a great job of linking regime, production, and political implications. Although, I thought some aspects of the article could be shrunk and keep it to the basic and informative issues. I think the topics did a great job of covering every aspect of the article. Great job!:) Farahnazkhurshid (talk) 06:48, 7 April 2020 (UTC)