User talk:Jmsa809

Welcome!
Hello, Jmsa809, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Trueability, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Mcampany (talk) 02:26, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Trueability


A tag has been placed on Trueability requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Mcampany (talk) 02:26, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

https://s.bankruptcyobserver.com


Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:20, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

I don't see where I am supposed to respond. This accusation is wholly offbase. I have trying to add value to wikipedia with what information I am familiar with, namely US bankruptcies. Jamie does not appear to know anything about bankruptcies. The US bankruptcy system is very difficult to navigate. It is not easy to find a case or find information about a case without incurring expenses. I have been trying to help where there are Wikipedia articles. I believe that this is valuable and helpful information. Second, wikipedia requires a reference for any information. You cannot link directly to the case, so I was providing the next best thing, a site with information about the case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmsa809 (talk • contribs)
 * Wikipedia is not a promotional vehicle for your website. There are always much better references available for bankruptcies; in all 58 cases where you'd added a link, there was either already a good reference from a much better source, or I was able to easily find one. If you continue to post links to your website, your account will be blocked indefinitely. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:59, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

I disagree with everything you wrote. In every case I was providing helpful information as to which court the case was filed in and the case number. In many instances I was actually providing information from filed documents and free links to the documents which can be hard to find and expensive. This is not information that is readily available. I am happy to stop doing this if that is the judgment of Wikipedia. Are you Wikipedia? Is there an process to appeal the judgment of one individual? Can you recommend a change in the format of my entries to better suit your sensibilities? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmsa809 (talk • contribs)
 * I recommend that you find some other way to promote your website. OhNo itsJamie Talk 19:16, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

I hear you. I was posting to provide information which I believe is valuable and helpful. You yourself acknowledged that the postings do not help with promotion. Is there a way to appeal your decision to others or are you the final arbiter? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmsa809 (talk • contribs)


 * I agree with the assessment of, these links do not pass our inclusion standards. See WP:EL.  —Dirk Beetstra T  C 14:44, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Can anyone me guide on what would be acceptable? I would like to be able to do two things, 1) provide information about the court and case number for important bankruptcies and 2) provide information about the cases which is shown in documents that are filed in the bankruptcy. It is not possible to link directly to case in PACER (the system that the US uses for reporting out bankruptcy case activity) nor is it possible to directly link to documents in the cases. Is something like this acceptable: https://www.bankruptcyobserver.com/document/LSC-COMMUNICATIONS/15? Please help. This is important information that is not being covered well in Wikipedia right now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmsa809 (talk • contribs)
 * You are not going to spam Wikipedia with links to your website, period. You will be blocked if you try again. I'm not commenting on this further. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

You have significantly mischaracterized what I am trying to do, and I am simply asking for help to do it properly. There are going to be a huge number of new bankruptcies this year and next and it is important that people be informed about them. The simple fact is that in the United States it is difficult to get information on bankruptcies, first it requires creating a user account, second it is hard to search for cases, and third it can cost a lot of money to retrieve documents. This is important information that you are preventing people from accessing with your strange tirade. Again, I am asking for someone else to intercede here and help me to be able to help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmsa809 (talk • contribs)