User talk:Jmucks/sandbox

Renata Peer Review -- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1srOyzR3knqO9R43_EjoXHdtFIzPwYmLq7f1Rm55pdTM/edit?usp=sharing

Reflection of peer feedback
a. While my comments in my article's talk page didn't get a response, I recieved some good feedback from both of my peer reviewers regarding areas that are strong or in need of improvement. Both of my reviewers mentioned that I should reevaluate the section titles I had chosen without much though to make them more specific and relevant to the content of the article. The reviers also pointed out places to eliminate typos and inconsistent grammar and to tighten up the article's prose.

b. I'll use the advice to make changes to my article. Because the article is in a good space structurally, I'll focus on editing sentence by sentence for clarity and conciseness. I'll plan to change the section titles to be more clear and specific about the content of the article. I'll also edit for flow and make sure that all of my citations are ready to be moved to the article when we go live. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmucks (talk • contribs) 18:38, 3 December 2019 (UTC)