User talk:Jmvkrecords

ayudame
Hello i am carla in spanish (carliitaeliza) you know me (tu me conoces soy carliitaeliza cree el articulo mindless behavior y tu lo borraste. '''ayudame me bloquearon solo porque le dije a laura que no me dijera carlita pues no me gusta no me dirigi de mala forma y me bloquearon y le pusieron proteccion a mi discusion y no puedo editar mi discusion ayudame es injusto que me bloquearan,por favor ayudame,espero tu respuesta ,ve a mi discusion en español y veras, saludos Carliitaeliza (talk) 15:19, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

no
No se si puedas hacer esto:puedes quitarle la proteccion a mi discusion quiero que recibir mensajes,editar mi discusion y no puedo aparte tengo algo importante o dile a alguien que se la quite porfavor,es injusto que me bloquearan en ningun momento me dirigi groseramente,ni con vocabulario ordinario,y todos se enojan porque uno dice la verdad, hay que decir las cosas como son no andar con enredos la verdad le dije que le borra a todos pues es verdad para que querria mentir me he dado cuenta que cuando mientes estan todos felices,aparte es mejor decir directamente que andar hablando a la espalda,cosa que detesto bueno eso PD:dile a chrishonduras y renegade monster que me saquen de aqui, y que necesito decirles algo muy delicado e importante,saludos Carliitaeliza (talk) 19:08, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

esperar
Se que tengo que esperar pero quiero que les comuniques algo de mi parte ¿puedes? y donde viste eso de que hablaban sobre mi bloqueo Carliitaeliza (talk) 19:48, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

correo
Perdon no puedo usar mi correo esta jaqueado a y dile a blackbeast que me desbloquee el me conoce es bibliotecario sabe de mi progreso en wikipedia por favor hazme ese favor,'no hize nada malo,solo dije lo que pensaba y de manera educada Carliitaeliza (talk) 20:21, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

no responderas
No me vas a ayudar,bueno si no quieres no importa ,¿no responderas? aqui hay ingleses no saben lo que hablamos Carliitaeliza (talk) 21:12, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

gracias ,gracias Carliitaeliza (talk) 21:31, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

y el mensaje
Me dijiste que le dejaste el mensaje a black beast y en su discu no tiene nada recuerda no puedo editar pero ver discusiones dejaselo porfavor aqui [] saludos Carliitaeliza (talk) 22:00, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

extraño
Sabes algo? estube viendo otros usuarios bloqueados,y a  todos  les rechazan su peticion de desbloqueo,parece que los bibliotecarios estan empeñados en rechazarle la solicitud de desbloqueo a todos,esta situacion me parece extraña es un asunto peculiar si tan solo estuviera entre nosotros el creador de wikipedia estarian todos en orden y derechamente cumpliendo las politicas de wikipedia,espero tu opinion Carliitaeliza (talk) 22:39, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Lee el mensaje de arriba y porfavor mandale un correo a chris honduras porfavor diciendole lo mismo que blackbeast,saludos Carliitaeliza (talk) 22:43, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Hola
,compañero,te quiero mucho,me bloquearon,para siempre en wikipedia en español,ve a mi pagina de usuaria hay un gran letrero y dice que fui expulsada de wiki en español,gracias por todo y por tu ayuda pero la verdad es esto: Wikipedia ha decaido muchísimo y la forma en que la mayoría de los administradores y bibliotecarios trabaja es totalmente arbitraria, grosera y cesgada. Siguen sus propios intereses particulares antes que las políticas de Wikipedia o el interés común. Bueno tratare de contactarme contigo en facebook o twitter o por aqui wikipedia en ingles como ahora ya,dale,te quiero,socio Carliitaeliza (talk) 22:52, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Como dice la gente...
en la vida cada final es un nuevo comienzo,saludos Carliitaeliza (talk) 00:38, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

No me quiero ir
La verdad no me quiero ir,el bloqueo fue por mentir no por,vandalismo,jamas haria eso ni aunque me dieran algo a cambio,bueno ahora comienzo de nuevo¿ comenzemos de nuevo? ya ,te quiero muchooooo!!! compañero Carliitaeliza (talk) 00:41, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Rename conflict
You renamed a user who is currently blocked on multiple wikis to User:Dmacks, which conflicts with the well established admin User:DMacks. This is likely to lead to a lot of confusion and I'm a bit concerned about possible impersonation. —  Earwig   talk 04:14, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * That is not just speculative. As part of my vandal-fighting and related admin actions, I have been subjected to attemped impersonation via similar usernames multiple times. Indeed this very user is a long-term abuser whom I have blocked and/or reverted including socks. Please undo this latest attempt of his at harassing me. Let me know when you do so that I can then claim and lock that account name to prevent future problems. DMacks (talk) 04:21, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the prompt fix! DMacks (talk) 05:54, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi, sorry you both, DMacks and The Earwig, for this inappropriate renaming. I reverted it. Usually software shows me similar names and notify me about possible conflicts with similar names. It seems, in this case, software didn't show me the problem. Sorry again. Jmvkrecords ⚜ Intra talk 05:56, 30 December 2015 (UTC).
 * Don't worry about it, and thanks for responding quickly. This might be worth looking into. —  Earwig   talk 06:02, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Forgotten db-user request (Se me olvidaba mi petición db-usuario)
No confío en correo electrónico por lo que me estoy repitiendo mi mensaje aquí. Si usted necesita mi mensaje en español, por favor me avisan. Gracias por toda tu ayuda.

Buenos días, Mi uso de la lengua española es de muy pobre casi inexistente aunque hace muchos años me enseñaron en la escuela y colegio. Espero que mi uso del inglés está bien.

Thank you for the notice of approval to changing my new username to Quaerens-veritatem; however, when I made the request through Special:GlobalRenameRequest I now realize that I forgot to add the "db-user" code to the top of the request page or to otherwise request that my userpage be deleted.

As such, I am asking you to delete my Exquirentibusveritatem userpage completely including deleting all past personal and all other information and including all history under "View history" or as "Revision history" to completely avoid any possibility of identity theft, harassment, etc., and also so I can have a fresh start under Quaerens-veritatem.

Thank you in advance for your help.

⬇️¡Gracias a Dios por el traductor de Google! ⬇️

Gracias por el aviso de aprobación para cambiar mi nuevo nombre de usuario a Quaerens-veritatem; Sin embargo, cuando hice la solicitud a través de Special: GlobalRenameRequest ahora me doy cuenta de que me olvidé de añadir el código "db-user" a la parte superior de la página de solicitud o de otra manera solicitar que mi página de usuario sea eliminada.

Como tal, le pido que elimine mi página de usuario Exquirentibusveritatem completamente incluyendo la eliminación de toda la información pasada personales y todos los demás e incluyendo toda la historia bajo "Ver historial" o como "Historial de revisiones" para evitar toda posibilidad de robo de identidad, acoso, etc., Y también para que pueda tener un nuevo comienzo bajo Quaerens-veritatem.

Gracias de antemano por su ayuda.
 * Hi. I can't delete these pages, because I'm not a sysop here. You can use a code, like on pages you want to be deleted, or you can contact a sysop to request this task. Regards, Jmvkrecords ⚜ Intra talk 07:55, 27 April 2017 (UTC).

Could you please explain...
had been wikistalking my contributions. Almost three quarters of their edits were either reversions of edits I made, or were comments on my contributions. They initiated an ANI discussion -- a bogus accusation I had violated 3RR -- without complying with the requirement of informing me of the ANI.

You renamed them referring interested parties to m:Special:GlobalRenameQueue/request/37637. I clicked on that link, and was informed only Stewards, Global renamers, WMF Support and Safety ID are authorized to read that record.

Was there a reason why this request should be kept confidential? If not, can you provide a link to the request that is readable by ordinary contributors?

Would you have agreed to this request if you had reason to believe its purpose was to obfuscate responsibility for questionable behaviour?

This individual acknowledged, to an uninvolved third party, that they had a history of making contributions using anonymous IP addresses, and had recently decided to create a named ID. Since then, almost three quarters of the edits they made, with this ID, targeted my contributions, so there is no question in my mind that the overwhelming use of this ID has been behaviour that violates WP:BATTLEGROUND.

I encountered an IP contributor who made what I regarded as a questionable prod. I left a note on the article's talk page, and it was the almost brand new ID CommotioCerebri who tried to defend the prod.

I explicitly asked them to confirm or refute whether they were a single individual participating in the discussion using multiple IDs. While they claimed they weren't, I am frankly extremely doubtful.

I think it is unlikely that they logged on, once a week or so, and picked a couple of my contributions to disrupt, only to then log off. I can't help wondering whether they may maintain a stable of sockpuppets, using each one to target a different victim.

So, how possible would it be to restore them back to their original ID-name, to make it easier for people to recognize when recent edits are not mistakes, but are part of a general pattern of ignoring policy?

(I said almost three quarters of their edits are connected to my contributions. It is simpler to list the 12 edits that weren't connected to my edits. ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,    The remaining 43 edits were all connected to my contributions.)

Cheers Geo Swan (talk) 23:12, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi Geo Swan. It is very little I can do to help you. I advise you to contact a local sysop or a local checkuser. I am not authorized to give details of this request, but it is evident that this is a request related with a courtesy vanishing. If you consider that renamed user has been changed his username to continue editing as IP, please contact a checkuser to try to solve the problem locally. If you think there is any misuse of my global renamer permission, you can contact a steward to ask for details about the problematic request.
 * Anyway, when making the name change I did not consider that the user was trying to obfuscate responsibility for questionable behavior. The last message on the user's talk page about what you are saying is old from two weeks ago. In the moment I changed the username, I did'nt have proofs about sockpuppets, and most of time, I can not know if a user has sockpuppets, unless it is a known pattern outside the local wiki. Regards, Jmvkrecords ⚜ Intra talk 04:02, 9 November 2017 (UTC).


 * Okay, I understand you can't reveal details. Geo Swan (talk) 07:46, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Discussion at Requests for permissions/AutoWikiBrowser
You are invited to join the discussion at Requests for permissions/AutoWikiBrowser. An indefinitely blocked user you are familiar with is requesting permissions here. Please take a look and let me know if you have an opinion. Thanks! S warm  ♠  19:38, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Done, Jmvkrecords ⚜ Intra talk 03:32, 23 June 2018 (UTC).