User talk:Jmwilson19

Welcome!
Hello, Jmwilson19, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Datpostmil, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Joseph2302 (talk) 18:54, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Datpostmil


A tag has been placed on Datpostmil requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:54, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Verifiability
If you can show that this expression is notable WP:GNG and prove this with reliable independent sources WP:RS, you are welcome to try again. If you can't show that it has reasonably widespread coverage in these sources, it will be regarded as 'made up', or a 'hoax' or original research WP:OR. Wikipedia is not the place for original research (or the other two...), or for trying to get people to use new words. You might be amazed at how many 'new words' get posted here. Then again, you might not. Peridon (talk) 19:14, 4 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Agree completely with this, even if the term wasn't made up then Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Unless the expression passes WP:GNG, it doesn't warrant a Wikipedia article. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:11, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Recent edit to Chuck Baldwin
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  22:42, 27 January 2016 (UTC)