User talk:Jnadal

Preservation (library and archival science)
Any citations you could give me for your info in the preservation article would be much appreciated. Just post the cites here if you like and I can add them in - I'm trying to footnote the piece and make sure the whole thing becomes wiki standard. If you would rather do your own footnotes, I can post the templates I use here for you.Efkeathley 12:23, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi Efkeathley! Citations are coming... gradually. I'm coordinating a project with my LS students to expand coverage and currently most of their editorial focus is on the linked wikipedia articles and we've yet to transfer that information over into the main page. Appreciate all your help with this and your efforts to get the archivists involved in wikipedia! Jnadal 14:21, 17 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm happy to see students working in an organized way to get more of this information onto the wiki. Over the next week I'm going to put unsourced information banners on the articles that need cites added in.  Preservation education is a subject near and dear to my heart.


 * Because this is a class project, you might want to make a note over on the article discussion page about the work in progress. There are some wiki editors who make a habit of going around deleting unsourced information, with the goal of getting contributors to cite their stuff as it is added.  However, people tend to give students working on projects a bit more consideration before overwriting their stuff.


 * Thanks for the suggestion - I added a "work in progress" note on the main page. Jnadal 15:42, 18 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Was it your group who suggested the article merge? Could you go to the article talk page and state why you do or do not think an article merge is a good idea?Efkeathley 11:56, 18 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure where that originated, but it's a reasonable idea. I added a comment in the discussion section. Jnadal 15:42, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Banks/Harris award
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Banks/Harris award, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Banks/Harris award appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Banks/Harris award has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Abductive (reasoning) 07:22, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Preservation administrator


The article Preservation administrator has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No evidence this occupation/job/position is notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 13:17, 28 December 2020 (UTC)