User talk:Jnelso95/Mather Tower

Peer Review
Hi. This is Grantloseke. Well done. Could do better by incorporating content into the lead section, and mention what is in the lead section already. Also, split the architecture and structure section in two sections, both using subheadings. (Grantloseke (talk) 23:43, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Peer Review
Hello, this is Ezafft1. Good additions to the content of this article/topic. Could be improved by clarifying the lead and including additional background information in the lead (architect and brief overview of article content). Also, applying working external links to sources, as well as using/incorporating information from peer-reviewed scholarly sources, would help improve the notability, credibility, and reliability of information in the article.(Ezafft1 (talk), 9 December 2022 (UTC)