User talk:Jnewengland

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edward Dugger has been accepted
 Edward Dugger, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! -- Sam Sing! 20:34, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Jnewengland help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Talkback
-- Sam Sing! 03:43, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Re: Clarence Alexander Rhone
Hi,

On live chat I was helping you with your draft of the article. I think these questions were answered:


 * You have 4 independent references -- the rock plaque, two books, and the placard in the public library.
 * You have 2 dependent references -- the employer and the park.
 * You should find more independent sources.
 * I was wrong in thinking that the pictures are not references. You can keep them in the references section.

As you left while I was still reading the article (you were patient in waiting, but I had left on an errand), I have the following comments to add:
 * Two pairs of these 4 independent references have the same author -- Kountze Mabray for one pair, and local government for the rock plaque and the placard in the public library.
 * This means we have two independent sources at present. (A source is an entity that holds information. A reference is a link to a particular instance in which the entity publishes this information.)

I would like to ask, when building the community center and the park tennis courts, did Clarence Alexander Rhone spend any money (and not only the invaluable and greatly appreciated years coaching tennis) on them?

--Gryllida (talk) 05:07, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

1. The source for the public library material is Tufts University (Department of Anthropology) + Medford Historical Society -not- the government. I mentioned this several times during live chat (including relevant link) and modified the draft page to reflect this. The library is only the display / publishing venue. Please see below. So there are 3 independent sources. OK?

2. Out of curiosity,  why do you ask about Rhone spending money on these items?

Thanks for allowing the pictures as references, your help + look forward to your response.





Jnewengland (talk) 12:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

The local community encouraged the installation of two library placards and the rock plaque. The local community did so because it owes a lot to Clarence Alexander Rhone, as he did a lot of work for them (and probably donated a lot of money for public cause). Effectively the local community are his business clients. Of course the clients would write nice things about him. Therefore I would treat the local community as a single source with three publishing instances, and its position puts it in an obligation to only write nice things about Clarence Alexander Rhone -- particularly after his death.

Therefore I would encourage to stop dwelling or lingering on the local obligatory gratitude writings. They are an important part of the article and I appreciate them as they give an in-depth coverage, but for the purposes of establishing notability they should not be the primary focus of the initial write-up and should constitute no more than 50% of the initial article revision.

Please look for sources which were published before 1970, and are in a position to give a more critical non-obligatory coverage. --Gryllida (talk) 22:21, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you Gryllida for taking the time to review this article in depth and provide so many feedbacks to make the article stronger. :-) I will do what I can to address your questions and concerns and report back here.  Sounds like it's close to being fit for the mainspace.  Thanks again and have a great rest of your week + weekend.

Jnewengland (talk) 02:21, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clarence Rhone (July 27)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clarence Rhone and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  07:16, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Clarence Rhone concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Clarence Rhone, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Clarence Rhone


Hello, Jnewengland. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Clarence Rhone".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:00, 27 January 2018 (UTC)