User talk:Jns4eva/archive 2

Page edited for re-submisson - help!
Hi there,

I tried to publish a new page about the Business Centre Association (BCA) and it was rejected by yourself. I have edited it to try and maintain a neutral tone, although this is trickier than I thought! Would you be able to review the copy again and let me know if I'm on the right lines? Do I need to click 're-submit' to allow you to do this?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Business_Centre_Association_%28BCA%29

Many thanks Jo

JLDeditor (talk) 17:30, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but it still reads like press agentry and trade association fluff. For starters: what on Earth is "the flexible workspace industry"???? -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  23:49, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I have to agree with Orangemike, there's still a lot of iffy text in the article. One good way to look at article creation is Dragnet's famous line: "Just the facts ma'am".  Things like "The BCA provides advice and location-finder services for potential users of flexible workspace" is a good example, as pointed out by Orangemike, as it sounds like you're trying to reach out to said people.  Instead of saying that, say something like "The BCA provides advice to it's clients about ___" and find a reference that backs it up.  A good example of a business page is Chicago Musical Instruments.  It covers the facts without POV pushing, it details the company history in a concise and neutral way and it has plenty of references to back up it's facts.  If you can, work a little bit more on making it neutral and resubmit it for creation.  That way, you'll have a fresh pair of eyes looking it over for neutrality issues and hopefully can get it published.  Thanks.  Jns4eva ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) (talk) 20:55, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Kenny

 * That's no reason to remove it. Wikipedia isn't for pushing your POV, it's for collecting information whether or not you like the information in question.  If you continue to remove the content, you will be banned from Wikipedia.  Please find a constructive way to contribute to the project.  Jns4eva ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) (talk) 22:41, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=610526415 your edit] to Sly Cooper may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:31, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
 * for Playstation Vita IGN |work=IGN |accessdate=May 28, 2014}} | The Sly Collection IGN .  Sly 1 and 2 are featured on the game card, while Sly 3 is accessed through an included

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

About the Peter Foldes page
Hi, the edit I made from that page is just redundancy. There were two wiki anchored from "A Short Vision" while the others don't have. I don't think that I made a mistake on editing it and removing the redundancy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Icecracker (talk • contribs) 15:10, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Untitled
Hey Thank you for your warm reminder, I know what my edits mean. But these templates are totally unncessary. First, that article has addressed what happened in 2016 which is quite recent and doesn't consequently need "update". Second, that article doesn't even have a source, how comes that it has "unreliable sources." --123.161.171.54 (talk) 00:46, 5 October 2017 (UTC)


 * I see your point but the reference you added is not a valid link and the article does need improvement. It's also generally frowned upon to revert an anti-vandalism bot.  The very top of the article in your revision is "bold text", which is unnecessary.  Also, the template is very necessary.  Granted, the source template is the wrong one but it is incomplete and needs both valid sources and additional information.  It's not just about one updated line with 2016 information.  Also please be aware of the three revert rule, which states you cannot revert an article more than three times in one day.  Feel free to respond to me here with your thoughts and response or if you have any questions!  Jns4eva (talk) 00:57, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia bot undo my changes after removing an external site
Hi,

I need help on this page Subject: I love you, I tried to remove the Randomdetox.com on the Reference, because it has nothing to do with that page. Seems like it's done for backlink purposes. Also tried to remove the youtube video link because I heard it is not allowed here. Thanks! This is icecracker btw

TJ dillashaw
I was wondering how my edit constituted vandalism? Before my edit the fight was listed as being won by (beyblade spin), I changed it to knee and punches. In addition I described how the fight was won in the upper section, its been reverted to an announcement which doesn't make sense since the fight just happened.


 * My apologies! I clicked the wrong IP address.  I've retracted my warning and I apologize for the error.  Jns4eva (talk) 05:45, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Chorlton High School
You deleted my edit to this page as you stated that I had not added any credible source. I went and found an independant credible source, although I was actually at the school at the time of said changes, so I in myself was a credible source. However, after removing my edit, you then went and plagiarized my information, almost word for word. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.21.155.226 (talk) 01:23, 25 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi there! There seems to be a bit of a misunderstanding.  My only edit to the page was to revert your edit as it did not contain a credible source.  I did not add any further information to the page afterwards, it appears that it was re-added by a different user after the revert.  Unfortunately, you do not count as a credible source as Wikipedia only allows third party references and does not allow original research.  See the article located at WP:NOR for more information.  Jns4eva (talk) 00:25, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Ali Athab
He has 5 million followers on YouTube. He received a gold medal. How did you detect spam? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:5EC0:9815:799C:DC7E:EEBD:A703:750F (talk) 05:56, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * It's up to you to answer that you do not know about Three-revert rule???

Complaint
I put a complaint against you in the board of directors for violating the three reversals. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:5EC0:9815:799C:DC7E:EEBD:A703:750F (talk) 06:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Well, you have to understand this is brief banter between my friend and I. All of the information on Danny Davis page is factual, and is verifiable by the cited sources.
 * Thank you for clarifying but Wikipedia articles are not for bantering with friends. Also, you only have a single source on the page.  My intention is definitely not to stop you from creating or editing a page, rather, it was simply to help you understand that removing speedy deletion tags is not the way to fix the article and unfortunately usually leads to a temporary block.  However, now that the page is in draft space, please continue to work on it and add more sources and information and make it a great article!  Jns4eva (talk) 20:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
A big cat; small cat; red cat; blue cat!!!!

elephant ruler??? that would be weird lollololololoo. please inform me of this interest

14442tt8479372 (talk) 19:58, 26 February 2021 (UTC) 

A goat for you!
goats have smelly shit.

sometimes.

∴enjoy.

14442tt8479372 (talk) 20:01, 26 February 2021 (UTC) 

look brah; you have to understand that the source is reputable; please stop attacking me and my feelings. i will have you know that you are being extremely rude.

👀 brah ➡️👤 have to 🛑 attacking my 💆‍♀️, ➕ my 🦸. i 🗣️❓️ of ➡️👤 to remove yourself from my 🧑‍💼, ➕ from my idols 🧑‍💼.

 * No one is being rude or attacking you (or your "idol"). My issue isn't with EPSN being a reputable source, it's with it being the ONLY source.  Also, please stop with the disruptive edits to my talk page.  Thanks!  Jns4eva (talk) 20:11, 26 February 2021 (UTC)