User talk:Jntr

Eco haulage
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Eco haulage, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://ecohaulage.com/about-us.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 17:04, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Eco haulage


A tag has been placed on Eco haulage, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:04, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Empty backloads


A tag has been placed on Empty backloads requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 18:23, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

External link spam added on Road transport
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Road transport do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Spam at Haulage
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Haulage. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.

February 2012
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Peridon (talk) 18:38, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Spam at Eco haulage
This is your last warning. The next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Eco haulage, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Zad68 (talk) 21:38, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

further explanation
On the now-deleted talk p. of this article, you wrote:


 * Due to this website being informative upon environmentally technologies that are being deployed in the current Haulage market in order to reduce Co2 emissions in order to conform to government legislations as well as going above and beyond. This is a revolutionary concept as its a rare occurrence that the private sector conforms and addresses environmental issues affecting us all!


 * I don't really understand why!? after all we all do need to look after the environment moor, so I think its a smart idea. Very informative and never knew this sort of market existed, means I can include this in my dissertation.

As reviewing administrator, I deleted the article: Wikipedia articles do not do this, or any sort of promotion, now matter how worth the cause.

A Wikipedia article needs to show notability with references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. It also needs to be written like an encyclopedia article, not a press release--don't praise the organization or person, say what they do. Don't talk about the overall importance of the subject--talk about what they have accomplished, as shown by the sources. Remember not to copy from a web site, even your own -- first it's a copyright violation, but, even if you own the copyright and are willing to give us permission according to WP:DCM, the tone will not be encyclopedic and the material will not be suitable.

Include only material that would be of interest to a general reader coming across the mention of the subject and wanting the sort of information that would be found in an encyclopedia. Do not include material that would be of interest only to those associated with the subject, or to prospective clients--that sort of content is considered promotional. Keep in mind that the goal of an encyclopedia is to say things in a concise manner, which is not the style of  press releases or  web sites, which are usually more expansive.

If you think you can do it right according to our guidelines, and if you haver the necessary sources, do so, but expect the article to be carefully checked for objectivity. To give you a chance to get the sources, I've blocked re-creation for a few days. I would suggest very strongly that you make absolutely certain you do have such sources, or you are, as warned, very likely to be blocked from editing.

For further information see our FAQ about business, organizations, and articles like this and also WP:FIRST.  DGG ( talk ) 23:45, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
 * If I may add to this, you say "Very informative and never knew this sort of market existed, means I can include this in my dissertation.". Am I right that you are creating the article so you can use it as a reference in your dissertation? Most academic bodies do not like the use of Wikipedia as a reference in papers and dissertations, and to be used like that is not part of our purpose. We are here to provide information that is referenced, and those references can be accessed and used academically. Peridon (talk) 11:56, 1 March 2012 (UTC)