User talk:JoAddams

Speedy deletion nomination of Под звуки поцелуев
Hello JoAddams,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Под звуки поцелуев for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 11:20, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Под звуки поцелуев for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Под звуки поцелуев is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Под звуки поцелуев until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 10:04, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at List of best-selling girl groups. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ''You have been informed multiple times in the past by me not to make sales claims without including reliable sources. Fanforum posts are not reliable sources, and solo sales of individual members do not belong in a group's sales count.'' Bennv3771 (talk) 13:17, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

December 2020
Hello, I'm Muhandes. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, I Love It (Kanye West and Lil Pump song), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 07:56, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * The same for My All. The source you provided does not mention this certification. Please go over all your edits and remove these certifications. --Muhandes (talk) 07:58, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * And the same for Let You Love Me and All I Am (Jess Glynne song). Where are you taking this information from? Do I need to revert all your edits? --Muhandes (talk) 08:02, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject Ricky Martin invitation
آرمین هویدایی (talk) 19:23, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Certification updates
Hi JoAddams. When you are updating certifications, like you did in most of your recent edits, please update the certyear field too, as this will ensure correct sales amount and footnotes. Also, please update access-date. Happy editing. --Muhandes (talk) 19:30, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Also, please be more careful, with edits like this one or this one or another which removed sources. --Muhandes (talk) 19:41, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello. I have noticed that you edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Muhandes (talk) 17:11, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I am asking you again to use edit summaries. Please remember that communication is requierd. --Muhandes (talk) 07:52, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Citation fields: url, access-date, date, url-status
Hi JoAddams. Please note that in this edit you made several citation errors. First, for an archived source The field url should be the original url, not the archived one. Second, the access-date field is for the data you accessed the article and not for the original publication data. For the original date we use the date field. Third, setting live means the original url is alive, and it isn't. You should set dead. Fourth, you are using date formats incorrectly. Since this is an article about an album by an English singer, the date format shoudl be day-month-year. Finally, a certification table should not be used if there are no certifications, use prose instead. Happy editing. --Muhandes (talk) 08:01, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello, I'm Ss112. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Cuff It, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Ss  112   06:27, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)