User talk:JoKalliauer/Archive

Speedy deletion of Benutzer:JoKalliauer
A tag has been placed on Benutzer:JoKalliauer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your reasoning on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 00:00, 4 November 2010 (UTC) User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow

Help
I can't fix this file File:Headspace Inc. logo.svg, it displays on the original web page, but not in Wikipedia. There was height="auto". My bot did not like it. I tried manually and changed to height="144" width="675", still don't display. Inkscape corrupts the image. Scibus crashes. Any chance you can have a look at it. Thanks. Ron h jones (Talk) 03:11, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
 * My edit now OK. must have been a caching issue stopping it showing. Ron h jones (Talk) 04:08, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Most likely a caching error, as said.
 * first try clearing the cache of Wikipedia with : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Headspace_Inc._logo.svg?action=purge
 * then update your cache of your browser: de:Hilfe:Cache (also it's German you might understand)
 * I noticed on commons complicated Files like File:Dojikko2.3.svg, that need more time for rendering, will be rendered over night. (Maybe I'm wrong.)
 * — Johannes  Kalliauer  - contrib. 23:40, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Reqest for IP_block_exemption
My IP is blocked, If you don't believe you are allowed to use a CheckUser
 * If you are unblocked, what articles do you intend to edit?
 * create a biography
 * all Sites that conatain https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Fake_PDF
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JoKalliauer
 * Why do you think there is a block currently affecting you? If you believe it's in error, tell us how.

Du bist aus dem folgenden Grund nicht berechtigt, die Seite zu bearbeiten:

Dein Benutzername oder deine IP-Adresse wurde gesperrt.

Die Sperrung wurde vom Administrator Primefac durchgeführt. Als Grund wurde Using Wikipedia for promotion or advertising purposes angegeben.

Beginn der Sperre: 15:25, 3. Jan. 2019 Ende der Sperre: 15:25, 10. Jan. 2019 Sperre betrifft: 217.149.172.0/22

Du kannst Primefac oder einen der anderen Administratoren kontaktieren, um über die Sperre zu diskutieren. Du kannst die „E-Mail an diesen Benutzer“-Funktion nicht nutzen, solange keine gültige E-Mail-Adresse in deinen Benutzerkonto-Einstellungen eingetragen ist oder diese Funktion für dich gesperrt wurde. Deine aktuelle IP-Adresse ist 217.149.172.131 und die Sperrkennung lautet 8763418. Bitte füge alle Informationen jeder Anfrage hinzu, die du stellst.

I would say I am a trustfull user on de.wikipedia and on commons.wikimedia:
 * Is there anything else you would like us to consider when reviewing your block?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/JoKalliauer

— Johannes  Kalliauer  - contrib. 21:33, 5 January 2019 (UTC) — Johannes  Kalliauer  - contrib. 21:39, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Any reason not to make the IP range block anon-only? Huon (talk) 21:44, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Not that I can think of - not sure why it was enabled in the first place (misclick?). Primefac (talk) 01:11, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Intercultural competence.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Intercultural competence.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Beland (talk) 20:49, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Katapult importance social distancing.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Katapult importance social distancing.gif. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 01:14, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:FearlessBooks WebLogo.png
Thanks for uploading File:FearlessBooks WebLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Logo iris.svg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Logo iris.svg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:52, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:FearlessBooks WebLogo.png
Thanks for uploading File:FearlessBooks WebLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Franz-Josef Ulm 2018.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Franz-Josef Ulm 2018.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 19:46, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Skinflint price comparision moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Skinflint price comparision, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:10, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

SVG
Hi @JoKalliauer, thanks for fixing the Flashrom SVG! PhotographyEdits (talk) 19:14, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Internal energy
Hi editor JoKalliauer. I have put on the talk page of the article Internal energy a comment about your recent edit. Please would you very kindly reply.Chjoaygame (talk) 13:15, 17 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Dear editor JoKalliauer, thank you for your post https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AInternal_energy&type=revision&diff=1105103345&oldid=1104984019 on the talk page of the article on internal energy. Perhaps you may like to talk a bit with me on my talk page. I will shortly start a section, headed 'Thermodynamics', there for the purpose.Chjoaygame (talk) 20:11, 18 August 2022 (UTC)


 * That you asked the question "Did I say something wrong?" suggested a good prospect for progress through a quiet cooperative chat.Chjoaygame (talk) 16:30, 25 August 2022 (UTC)


 * I always assume good faith. Would you like to discuss on the talk-page or more quite via Skype,Zoom,… ? Would you like to raise a question?  — Johannes  Kalliauer  - contrib. 16:34, 25 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your prompt and positive reply. It is in the small hours of the morning here, and I ought to be asleep. Please let me reply later.Chjoaygame (talk) 19:19, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I am overloaded at present. Let me come back soon.Chjoaygame (talk) 16:18, 26 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The Grand_canonical_ensemble uses the Grand_potential which is a function of Internal_energy, see Grand_potential. Either you slit Internal_energy into Internal_energy (macroscopic) and Internal_energy (microscopic), or you include both topics in this article. But just because you are familiar to only one of them, does not mean the other one is unimportant.  — Johannes  Kalliauer  - contrib. 17:34, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

The total energy of a body is the sum of several components. Let $$V$$ denote the potential energy of the body as a whole, with respect to external fields, $$K$$ its kinetic energy as a whole relative to its surroundings, and $$U$$ its internal energy. Then its total energy $$E$$ is given by
 * $$E= U+K+V$$.

Chjoaygame (talk) 07:37, 17 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Sorry K is only the "external kinetik energy"!
 * Increasing the temperature increases the internal kinetic energy, and therfore also the internal energy.
 * — Johannes  Kalliauer  - contrib. 17:35, 17 January 2023 (UTC)


 * You write “It excludes the kinetic energy of the system as a whole”, this is pretty vage. Do you mean the kinetic energy of the center of mass of the system, or the movement of the boundary of the system? Because the center of mass can change without changing the position of the boundaries.  — Johannes  Kalliauer  - contrib. 21:36, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your thoughtful post.

The kinetic energy of the system as a whole is the sum of the kinetic energies of its microscopic constituents considered as moving with respect to its surroundings, less the sum of the kinetic energies of its microscopic constituents considered as moving with respect to the system itself, defined its centre of mass considered as moving with respect to its surroundings. It is part of the definition of a thermodynamic system that it is in its own state of internal thermodynamic equilibrium.Chjoaygame (talk) 22:34, 17 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Let’s assume a box that is held in place to all surroundings (i.e. the earth stops spinning and just stays in place). That means if you have a closed box (e.g. a closed insulated bottle) not interacting with the surrounding in a gravitational field, and the orignially mixed liquid inside seperates into the heavy substances at the bottom and the lighter substances at the top, the center of mass moves with respec to its surroundings, but the box stays in place. So the seperation in the box creates a kinetic energy of the system as a whole, even though the box is not moving at all?  — Johannes  Kalliauer  - contrib. 01:25, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your thinking this over.

It is part of the definition of a thermodynamic system that it is in its own state of internal thermodynamic equilibrium.Chjoaygame (talk) 01:46, 18 January 2023 (UTC)


 * How says that? As soon as you change temperature or preasure or a chemical reaction is going on, it won’t be in a state of internal thermodynamic equilibrium, that’s why we have wind within a closed system (e.g. earth).  — Johannes  Kalliauer  - contrib. 02:22, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for writing a 7.900 bytes comment. Maybe there should exist two articles one about Internal energy (thermodynamics) and one about Internal energy (statistical ensemble). As long as Grand_potential links to Internal energy, Internal energy has to cover both topics. — <span style="font-family:Trendy, Tempus Sans Itc;">Johannes  Kalliauer  - contrib. 17:59, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

To use an Americanism, you're welcome!Chjoaygame (talk) 19:54, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

The physical substance here is the distinction between a body of matter in its own state of internal thermodynamic equilibrium, and a system that is not so. Both the thermodynamic system and the ensembles of statistical mechanics refer to one and the same physical state of internal thermodynamic equilibrium, for which they assume the existence of a properly defined entropy.

The difference between thermodynamic equilibrium and non-equilibrium isn't just a difference of ball parks, nor a difference of planets, nor of solar systems: it's a difference of galaxies. For a non-equilibrium system, hardly anyone even tries to talk about giving a proper definition of entropy.Chjoaygame (talk) 21:35, 18 January 2023 (UTC)