User talk:JoRosAL

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page Fanboy and Chum Chum, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the "sandbox" rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 04:56, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

July 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Fanboy and Chum Chum. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:02, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Entertainment Software Rating Board. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Mild Bill Hiccup (talk) 04:12, 19 July 2011 (UTC)


 * JoRosAL, please keep in mind that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a forum. When you begin an edit with language such as "On the contrary" it's probably an indication that you are contributing opinions instead of facts.  Further, if you do wish to contribute facts, please be aware that the facts have to be verifiable.  It would be worth your effort to find sources for your contributions and include them in your edits.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:33, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at IGo to Japan, you may be blocked from editing. SQGibbon (talk) 20:44, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fanboy and Chum Chum, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have been asked several times not to remove content or submit original research. Please provide references when you make changes to articles. If you cannot control your impulsive edits, you will be nominated for administrative intervention. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:08, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of McCarran Boulevard


The article McCarran Boulevard has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable US street. Doesn't meet the guidelines at WikiProject U.S. Streets

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ryan Vesey Review me!  04:45, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

edit to los angeles page
hey! please read the sources carefully before you change material cited to them. the article summarized the source correctly until your change made the sentence incorrect according to the source in the edit you made here. &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 01:19, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Caughlin Fire


The article Caughlin Fire has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * As per WP:NOT. While a newsworthy event no sources have been supplied to indicate that it is a notable event as per Wikipedia standards (i.e., of lasting notability).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SQGibbon (talk) 06:29, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Caughlin Fire for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Caughlin Fire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Caughlin Fire until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SQGibbon (talk) 21:26, 16 January 2012 (UTC)